SBIR/STTR Research Award

Analyzing Toxicity to Mammalian Cells by Flow Cyometry

Award identifier 1d24c87fd7b2baec76a644fc4970165b8c5de7431c32f94abe73e23fbd7a29b7Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$429,497

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1996

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Litron Laboratories Ltd
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
LJH7LE9AUHL5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Our Phase I research program is based on years of research which strongly suggest that high speed f(FCM) is a technology that can significantly improve toxicity assays. Highly reliable clastogen andhave been developed in our laboratories where FCM has played a major role in processing and analyzinfollowing exposure. In both cases, a significant improvement over conventional assays has resulted.Phase I is to validate both the FCM-based micronucleus assay and the FCM-based tumor promoter assay,stage in Phase I for the development of an FCM-based mutation assay. Thus, an aim is to provide reliassays that offer a significant advance over existing methods by focusing on and quantitating specifreflect a toxic response. Validation of the FCM-based micronucleus assay for detecting clastogenic astarting point for this research program. The conventional micronucleus assay is costly, labor intennumbers of animals and provides marginal statistics. Too few cells are usually scored by hand, and vslides is highly subjective. We will demonstrate how an FCM-based micronucleus assay can reduce costsamples in a shorter time, reduce the number of animals needed while vastly improving the statisticsto the highly subjective nature of hand counting, flow cytometry provides an objective method for evof micronuclei in blood cells. Methods have been developed in our laboratory which accurately scoreerythrocyte population at rates exceeding 10,000 cells/second so that cells are being processed at lthan hand counting. Since all of the development work has involved a few select chemicals, one aim oprogram will be to expand the battery of clastogens and spindle poisons that have been screened within order to demonstrate the general applicability and validity of the method. Similarly, as a resultdeveloped an FCM-based method for screening tumor promoters. These epigenetic agents are invisible itoxicology tests, yet promoters play a major contributory role in the process of neoplastic transforpass through conventional short term in vitro genetic toxicology screening, and the first evidence tpromoter is typically the occurrence of tumors in animal studies. Reliable in vitro assays for detecreduce costly animal experiments by permitting the evaluation of promotional activity earlier in proanother aim of Phase I will be to validate the FCM-based tumor promoter assay that has been develope

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

42 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1985–2025). Reported award amounts total $18,400,554. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.