SBIR/STTR Research Award

Decoy Peptides: Development of a Novel Therapeutic for Metastatic Cancer

Award identifier 04c6c851d8e9c54687ff4f193cb76ce04127210da7a279e0fddd5b1fda5d0cb3Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
New England Research Institutes, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FFWJTXCKDLK5
Solicitation number
PA12-088
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): There are two components to this study where human subjects are involved: development of content, and assessment of content. For the Development and Reel Review three focus groups will be held: 1) general audience; 2) minority, 3) parents specifically. We will conduct groups in these three categories to ensure we produce a film that is generally appealing, but also addresses the important concerns discussed in this proposal regarding minority and pediatric populations inparticular. Development focus groups (n=30): Subjects will be recruited with the assistance of Amy Tonkonogy of WGBH, to gather groups representing national broadcast appeal. Reel Clip focus groups: The Reel Clip focus groups will be held with the same individuals who participated in the Development focus groups. 6.1.2. Sources of Material Participation will consist of (for development) discussing the content needs and delivery approach of the program. The feasibility assessment (clip reel review) will involve reviewing the script and clip reel to determine if we addressed the concerns of the participants. 6.1.3. Potential Risks There are no anticipated risks to participation in the review f content or feasibility discussions. 6.2. ADEQUACY OF PROTECTION AGAINST RISKS 6.2.1. Recruitment and Informed Consent Participants will be recruited with assistance from Amy Tonkonogy, building from expertise on testing programs for national broadcast. Access to participants will be through established methods of recruitment used by WGBH. Once identified, NERI will conduct informed consent prior to conducting the interviews, which will occur at NERI (WGBH is conveniently located within several miles of NERI, and NERI will provide an independent location for holding the groups). 6.2.2. Protection against Risk The major risk to the participants is a breach in confidentiality. Any identifying information captured during discussions or review of the program will be recorded electronically and be stored on a locked project drive accessible to the project staff (PI and PM). All names and identifying information captured during recording will be removed during transcription. 6.3. POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED RESEARCH TO THE SUBJECTS AND OTHERS There is no expected benefits to participation. The benefits of participation in the prototype evaluation may include acquired knowledge about clinical trials. 6.4. IMPORTANCE OF THE KNOWLEDGE TO BE GAINED If this program is an effective it could improve knowledge of clinical trials andreduce the reliance on misinformation and misperceptions about trial participation. 6.5. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV Not Applicable PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Despite decades of work to improve the safety of research subjects, fear about mistreatment of potential research participants remains a concern for many. Mistrust as a result of early, well-publicized abuses continues to outweigh the many rules and requirements now in place to ensure high ethical standards. These fears are particularly entrenched with minority and underserved populations such as children. Excellence in research is essential to our health and quality of life, yet while many potential participants recognize the need for clinical studies, they avoid participating.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

115 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2017). Reported award amounts total $30,701,719. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.