SBIR/STTR Research Award

Non-Helium Cold Spray System for Nuclear Component Repair and Retrofit

Award identifier a99b30b042100051ebcb510fc192e85b0591d51a2b719a66826f07f9051a26a6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,649,846

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
VRC Metal Systems, LLC
Proposal award date
2025-04-14
Contract end date
2027-04-13
UEI
N74FCX6AGAZ5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003462
Topic code
C57-13c

Research abstract

While nuclear energy offers a number of advantages over conventional energy plants, including lower-cost operations and reduced carbon emission; to meet global energy needs and reduce nuclear power plant forced outages, cost effective methods of maintaining current reactors and efficient methods of building new reactors will be needed. Cold Spray (CS) is a solid-state deposition method that has been investigated in several applications in the nuclear sector. CS systems typically require expensive helium carrier gas to achieve the required particle deposition velocity for high-performance, dense deposits, that have lower than 1% porosityi. To reduce costs, improve efficiency, and extend operational lifetime, VRC Metal Systems, LLC, (VRC) proposes non-helium, high-pressure CS system for deposition of suitable materials for production, repair, and retrofit of nuclear reactor components. Hydrogen has similar gas dynamic properties to helium and analytical models based on the work of Champagne and Helfritch, et. al.ii show higher velocity capabilities using hydrogen due to the low molecular weight and high sonic velocity. Hydrogen is also significantly cheaper than helium, roughly 2.5x less based on purchasing in compressed bottled form and is not subject to availability issues. Phase 1 used a protype hydrogen system to successfully spray nickel and Inconel625 deposits in comparison to helium deposits at the same conditions. The hydrogen system builds off existing CS system designs, incorporating an enclosed environment and ventilation to accommodate the process gas. The results showed the hydrogen gas deposited at higher rates and produced higher quality deposits compared to helium at the same setpoints. This corresponds with calculations that hydrogen can achieve velocities equal or greater than helium without heat, further illustrating the potential of hydrogen as a viable gas for safely producing high quality cold spray deposits. The primary groups benefiting from the proposed work are the US Department of Energy (DoE) and nuclear energy companies. However, a deposition method capable of coating large components at low costs will be viable in many other industries including renewable energy, conventional energy, automotive, aerospace, and many other industries.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

33 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $19,051,667. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.