SBIR/STTR Research Award

Accurate and performant finite element analysis of giga-cast parts

Award identifier 8ef9b0d484cf59172c9d6db5a55a5dec7b87b5e833ed02734854499d6c8019f4Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Coreform Inc.
Proposal award date
2025-04-14
Contract end date
2027-04-13
UEI
J1ANDWSEKAK3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003462
Topic code
C57-01b

Research abstract

Aluminum gigacasting is rapidly reshaping the automotive industry, unlocking a powerful path toward unprecedented profitability. Traditional vehicle assemblies often consist of parts made using a variety of techniques—such as die-casting and sheet-metal forming—that are then painstakingly joined through methods like welding and fastening. This results in higher costs and greater complexity in production. Gigacasting involves the use of large-scale die-cast aluminum components to replace traditional multipart assemblies, revolutionizing the manufacturing process. The potential for cost savings is immense, driven by superior precision and tolerances. However, automakers rely heavily on engineering simulation for performance and safety testing, and it is not well-suited to the specific requirements of large-scale aluminum gigacast parts. Simulating giga-cast parts using existing tools is extremely time-consuming and expensive. This project offers a compelling solution by enabling direct simulation of aluminum die-cast parts on highfidelity design models, bypassing many of the workflow steps that make traditional automotive simulation so costly. The enabling technology is an innovative approach that is based on higher-order smooth spline elements. In Phase I of this project, enough progress was made on this new automotive workflow that an entire simulation of a gigacast assembly was set up and executed in just a few hours, instead of weeks. This demonstrated the transformative impact of the software on automotive simulation processes. This Phase II project aims to enhance the performance and scalability for simulating complex gigacast assemblies. The project will include close coordination with automotive manufacturers to ensure good product/market fit. The technology to be developed in this project offers the opportunity to dramatically reduce simulation time, enhance accuracy, and eliminate redundancies in the simulation of automotive gigacast parts. By consolidating both thin and solid part simulations into a single, streamlined process, manufacturers can accelerate product development, reduce costs, improve user safety, and minimize the risk of errors. This technology may facilitate the future of automotive design and production.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

32 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $19,275,190. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.