SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-Efficiency Muzzle Flash Suppressor

Award identifier 5d5842d136eeec350775f046e105b3c4ea68992836a564969e2f2e8e94a07312Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$75,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

128 High-Efficiency Muzzle Flash Suppressor--Ultramet, 12173 Montague Street, , Pacoima, CA 91331-2210; (818) 899-0236 Mr. Brian E. Williams, Principal Investigator Mr. Craig N. Ward, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG03-97ER82504 Amount: $75,000 In the event of a hostile act, protective forces at DOE facilities may need to return fire. Unfortunately, firing their weapons would give off a visual signature. Technology to suppress this visual signature is not presently available; for example, current flash suppressor designs eliminate only secondary flash. Their operation is based on the expansion of muzzle gases, thereby cooling those gases and suppressing secondary ignition. Unfortunately, these designs do little to eliminate intermediate flash and nothing to eliminate or hide the primary flash, and thus are not highly effective. In Phase I, a total flash suppression system will be developed for small arms; it will combine gas expansion cooling with a high surface area and a high heat capacity thermal absorber/particulate filter material. This will eliminate intermediate and secondary flash and successfully hide the primary flash while also eliminating acoustic blast. The flash suppressor system is based on an open-cell refractory metal foam structure originally designed for cooling and filtering gas generator exhausts, as in cooling automobile airbags. Using the same principles as the airbag filter system, 1200¿C cooling and 99 percent filtration of solid particulates should be achievable in a small, low-cost suppressor design. Approximately 100 flash suppressor design variations will be designed, fabricated, and tested, and high-speed video to record flash brightness to a real extent will lead to a quantitative evaluation and optimization of suppressor performance. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: This project will result in a total flash suppression system for small and medium-caliber arms. The technology will be of immediate and significant use to government security forces guarding sensitive installations and police SWAT teams. Military applications include muzzle blast overpressure reduction in large-caliber weapon systems as well as small arms flash suppressors.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.