SBIR/STTR Research Award

Technologies for the rapid engineering of bacterial chromosomes with synthetic DN

Award identifier b6cd6931e9a5ab6505de1d3619ee2f332f3c1e12731948fb5958f28446c1a1f2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Biosearch Technologies, Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NX7NLJUNSEU6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The long term goal of the project is to develop enabling technology for the synthesis of long DNA sequences and for their insertion into bacterial chromosomes with concomitant replacement or deletion of unwanted or unneeded host DNA. Our initial studies will concentrate on developing the technology for the rapid metabolic engineering of E. coli for the production of pharmaceutically active polyketide natural products. The chromosome engineering approach that we will pursue will require the development of two technical components: (A) the high-throughput, economical synthesis of long (30-50 kb) DNAs and (B) the ability to efficiently and specifically insert these large DNAs into bacterial chromosomes. The specific aims of the proposal are to: (1) Use long synthetic gene gorging (lsGG) to replace a model singe-gene target in E. coli with varying lengths of synthetic DNA (5 to 32 kb) and to measure the efficiency of lsGG- mediated single- gene target replacement as a function of DNA length. The DNA donor sequence will be comprised of synthetic DNA encoding one to six modules of the DEBS polyketide synthase, the megaenzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of 6-deoxyerythronolide B (6- dEB), the macrolide core of the antibiotic erythromycin. The DEBS synthetic DNA has already been synthesized and is functionally expressed in E. coli. (2) Use lsGG to replace a large 82 kb chromosomal segment of E. coli with up to 32 kb of synthetic DNA. (3) Use lsGG to replace a second large chromosomal segment in the modified strain produced in aim #2. The synthetic DNA donor sequence, which has already been prepared and functionally expressed in E. coli, encodes the biosynthetic pathway for the hydroxylation and glycosylation of 6-dEB. The ability to rapidly engineer bacterial chromosomes with long synthetic DNAs would have broad implications in human health. Potential applications of the technology include the rapid development of engineered bacterial strains that either (a) abundantly produce pharmaceutically important natural products, available only in limited quantities from natural hosts or (b) catalyze the degradation or bioremediation of environmental toxins.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2010). Reported award amounts total $6,757,218. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.