SBIR/STTR Research Award

NAAG Peptidase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury

Award identifier 16026bd37383547cf09970f5e88f28951066a38db002d9cfcd6544c8bd644d0bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$760,811

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
PsychoGenics Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
YXMNA8N7LFG4
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious public health concern. It is estimated that severe TBI will become the third most common cause of death and disability globally by the year 2020. An estimated 1.5 million person s sustain a TBI in the United States annually resulting in more than 230,000 hospitalizations and 50,000 deaths. The annual economic cost to society for the care of head-injured patients has been estimated to exceed 25 billion. In particular, there is a d esperate need to have therapeutic agents available to treat head injuries that occur in large numbers among US troops engaged in combat. However, no truly efficacious and approved therapies are currently available for the treatment of TBI. Glutamate-recept or-mediated cell injury acts as an important mechanism of secondary brain damage after TBI. NAAG peptidases (GCPII and III) are extracellular enzymes that hydrolyze N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) to N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and glutamate (Glu) following t he release of the peptide into the synaptic space. Inhibition of GCPII and III increases NAAG levels with the consequent activation of presynaptic group II mGluRs and inhibition of transmitter release including glutamate. These actions have the potential t o provide neuroprotection in clinical conditions in which Glu mediates and mGluR3 activation reduces clinical pathology. To date, our research team has identified a number of urea-based compounds including ZJ 43, ZJ 11 and ZJ 17 as NAAG peptidase inhibitor s with nM potency after extensive structure activity relationship studies. Data from animal studies have demonstrated that administration of ZJ 43 represents a potential novel strategy to provide neuroprotection after TBI. However, there exists an importan t concern that these compounds are too polar to readily penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The development of prodrugs will provide the means for precise dose delivery to the brain as well as the use of lower dose ranges that obviate the problem of u nwanted systemic side effects. The long-term goal of this research project is to develop these NAAG peptidase inhibitors as novel therapeutics for TBI. In order to accelerate the development and application of these compounds for human clinical trials, the immediate goal of this research proposal is to develop novel prodrugs to improve the BBB penetration capabilities of our candidate NAAG peptidase inhibitors. It is noteworthy that our very recent preliminary data have demonstrated that one mono-ester prod rug of ZJ 43 is three-fold more active than the parent drug ZJ 43 in Fmr1 knockout mouse models of fragile X syndrome and autism. All these preliminary findings encouraged us to pursue extensive studies on the design, synthesis and pharmacological investig ation of prodrugs of our NAAG peptidase inhibitors. Through funding from this two- year SBIR grant, we intend to bring our discovery of the efficacy of NAAG peptidase inhibitors in animal models of TBI to a higher level of preclinical development and ultim ately to foster the translation of this concept into clinical trials. Specific Aim 1: Synthesis of compounds: Rational design and synthesis of new prodrug forms of lead NAAG peptidase inhibitors. Based upon the structures of our lead NAAG peptidase inhibit ors and the successful results achieved for some commercial prodrugs, ten prodrugs including seven mono-ester or amide prodrugs and three 1,4-dihydropyridine prodrugs of the current best drug candidates ZJ 43, ZJ 11, and ZJ 17 will be synthesized for the t esting described in Aim 2. In addition, 1.0 gram each of the above three parent NAAG peptidase inhibitors will be prepared as reference compounds for the studies of their prodrugs for the purpose of efficacy comparison. Specific Aim 2: Pharmacological stud ies of the above prodrugs: Testing of above compounds using an in vivo TBI model. The prodrugs identified in Aim 1 will be tested for cellular protection in

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,097,788. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Contractor profile

PSYCHOGENICS INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.