SBIR/STTR Research Award

Flow Channel Inserts for Dual-Coolant ITER Test Blanket Modules

Award identifier 8f77e8d89ee39e62b3bb04f063d7c87d8fd5525ba5346a5a664d46f1ac476319Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$749,997

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
DE-FG02-06ER06-09
Topic code
33

Research abstract

The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is an international effort to build the first power-producing, agnetically-confined fusion reactor within the next decade. The reactor design requires the development of advanced materials for flow channel inserts that will accomodate a lead-lithium (Pb-Li) alloy, tritium-breeder exit temperature of ~700°C. The flow channel insert must have low thermal and electrical conductivity, resistance to thermally induced stress, impermeability, and non-reactivity with the Pb-Li alloy. This project will develop a sandwich structure for these inserts, using a previously-developed, high-specific-stiffness open-cell silicon carbide (SiC) foam with integrated, thin, dense SiC face sheets (80-90% porous). The structure not only will satisfy the above requirements, but also will be far more manufacturable, exhibit higher thermal stress resistance, and cost substantially less than SiC/SiC composites. In Phase I, a matrix of SiC-foam/SiC-facesheet, flow-channel insert specimens was fabricated, and thermomechanical modeling and liquid metal testing were performed. The modeling and test results indicated that the concept could meet the flow channel insert requirements. In Phase II, a 30-cm tall, flow-channel insert section (12×12 cm2 cross-section) will be designed and fabricated for testing with high temperature Pb-Li. The properties of the SiC foam/SiC facesheet insert first will be optimized through thermal, mechanical, and chemical testing. Test results will be incorporated with thermomechanical modeling to determine the optimal SiC foam density and foam/facesheet thickness. Performance will be demonstrated by subjecting components to an environment that simulates that of an actual flow channel insert. Commercial Applications and other Benefits as described by the awardee: Nuclear fusion is an ideal alternative to increasingly scarce and expensive fossil fuels, and can provide a much greater quantity of environmentally sound energy than wind, solar, and geothermal sources. The proposed flow channel insert should serve as a key component that would enable fusion reactors tol ultimately be used for large-scale commercial energy generation.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.