SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nanostructured Cathode for Magnesium Ion Batteries

Award identifier 772ff347bbcf2b14a5dc67d4103645588574caf3f60558ea3598155cebcd14bcAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MATERIALS MODIFICATIONS INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
PXFHME8QVPT6
Solicitation number
DE-PS02-08ER08-34
Topic code
08 a

Research abstract

A rechargeable magnesium battery would be a promising candidate for high-energy-density generation due to the natural abundance of magnesium compared to lithium, the relatively low price of its raw materials, and the higher safety of metallic magnesium compared to lithium. The only deterrent to the development of magnesium-based rechargeable batteries has been the sluggish Mg2+ insertion into ion-transfer hosts, owing to the strong polarization effect of the small and divalent Mg2+ ion compared to Li+ or Na+. Therefore, it is necessary to develop practical cathode materials that exhibit fast Mg2+ mobility, in addition to other requirements such as electronic conductivity. This project will develop a nanostructured cathode, which will have high magnesium insertion and release, for use in magnesium ion cells. In particular, nanostructured phospho-olivines will be investigated, as they exhibit the potential for high specific capacity (> 150 mAhg-1) with good magnesium intercalation/transport properties for magnesium ion batteries. Unfortunately, the electrochemical properties of this material are dependent on composition and morphology. Thus, an optimum composition must be chosen from the wide range of compositions possible. In Phase I, a high-throughput combinatorial technique will be used to rapidly screen a wide range of compositions of phosopho-olivines. The cathode material with best capacity and potential will be chosen for the fabrication of prototype magnesium batteries, and detailed testing will be conducted in Phase II. Commercial Applications and other Benefits as described by the awardee: Magnesium battery systems would be a safe and environmentally friendly substitute for environmentally problematic Ni¿Cd and lead acid battery systems, and would be a cheap alternative to lithium ion cells. Magnesium batteries should find use in applications that currently use Ni-Cd and lead acid batteries, and that cannot be replaced by lithium ion batteries due to their high cost. Magnesium battery technology is also well suited for heavy-load applications such as power tools and drills, and for load-leveling systems at power grid substations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

166 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2024). Reported award amounts total $34,897,489. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.