SBIR/STTR Research Award

Analysis and Characterization of Pattern Classifiers

Award identifier d2601a8b5c1f2b18dba659d086bc5f33935ed1a705995bbd589ef05accab2acfAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
P7SFAJZ6M9J6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

"Frontier Technology, Inc. (FTI) and University of Florida (UF) propose to develop designs for automatically-generated statistical pattern recognition systems (GASPs) that can classify uncooperative targets among time-varying natural and manmadebackgrounds. We also propose to analyze the performance of the envisioned GASPs to:(a) covertly acquire feature data (e.g., statistical, spectral, and spatial cues) from target/background imagery,(b) apply multiple classifiers to target/background information to select probable target location and identity,(c) apply inferencing rules to disambiguate infeasible or contra-dictory classifier outputs.Pattern selection, key to successful system operation in mission- and threat-specific scenarios, will utilize Dempster-Schaefer the-ory and UF's powerful data fusion paradigm, Morphological Neural Nets (MNN).Phase-I will evaluate, extend and exploit FTI and UF's success-ful, DoD-sponsored R&D for dynamic pattern recognition and ATR to develop and test an efficient system design for target classifier output fusion and disambiguation. System design will includeanalysis of complexity and cost of potential hardware implementa-tions. In a Phase-II effort, we will use Phase-I results to drive candidate pattern downselection in FTI's DoD-supported TNE para-digm. MNNs and TNE have been proven highly successful in awide va-riety of recognition problems, thus we propose to analyze GASP sys-tem performance in realistic ATR scenarios. If successful, the proposed research will constitute a breakthrough in the solution of problems related to automatic target classifica-tion and pattern recognition. These problems occur extensively throughout both the military and commercial sectors: thepotential payoff is high. FTI will license or sell the solution to large aerospace companies for military applications. We plan to partner with a commercial company involved in law enforcement technologies, environmental monitoring and drug enforcementtechniques.C. KEYWORDSAdaptive Pattern Recognition, Neural nets (NN's), Morpholo

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

158 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2022). Reported award amounts total $52,237,604. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

FRONTIER TECHNOLOGY INC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.