SBIR/STTR Research Award

Bone Conduction Testing for Newborn Hearing Screening

Award identifier 3b593324e1c487f7224045ce1ca1a5f7882a4705ad86ce108acc16a54d1a38f2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
INTELLIGENT HEARING SYSTEMS CORP
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
P6QDBDAB9KS4
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NIDCD

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This study aims to develop an improved neonatal hearing screening device that will incorporate novel testing procedures combining simultaneous air and bone conduction testing so that mild hearing losses (lt 35 dB nHL) are better and consistently detected. The proposed device will address the current need for a more sensitive hearing screening tool by stimulating at lower levels and providing bone conduction stimulation in order to differentiate between sensorineural and conductive components. Intelligent Hearing Systems has previously developed a Stimulus Intensity-Ramping Technique for quickly determining frequency specific AEP hearing thresholds. This technique will be expanded and combined with bone conduction testing using various approaches, including: A) Interweaving Air-Bone stimulation, B) Dual-Rate Air-Bone stimulation and C) Overlapping Air-Bone Intensity-Ramping Stimulation. A new generation of high fidelity bone-conduction stereo headphones will be used to deliver stimuli. During Phase I, the current software and hardware of the IHS hearing screening device will be modified to accommodate the proposed dual-ear simultaneous air and bone conduction testing paradigm. Experiments will be conducted to determine the feasibility of combining these testing paradigms and to determine their effectiveness and efficiency. Data will be collected from 10 young adults with normal hearing and 15 newborns. Newborns will be tested in order to determine the feasibility of the proposed technique on the target population. During Phase II, a comprehensive clinical study will be conducted on newborns. This new approach will allow for better management of hearing loss cases and implementation of more efficient rescreening policies. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Newborn hearing screening is an important assessment tool in the early identification of infants hearing loss. The implementation of the proposed automated dual air and bone stimulation and analysis techniques is expected to greatly improve thereliability and validity of hearing screening. As such, the proposed work will greatly impact public health by developing better newborn hearing screening systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

38 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,140,171. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.