SBIR/STTR Research Award

Audiometric Behavioral Response Simulator

Award identifier f1b9c6495413163c24ab28dc33e876d00e80f9d8995519c00301c61063b46b42Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
INTELLIGENT HEARING SYSTEMS CORP
Proposal award date
2019-09-02
Contract end date
2020-08-31
UEI
P6QDBDAB9KS4
Solicitation number
PA18-574
Topic code
Y

Research abstract

The aim of this project is to develop an audiometric testing response simulatorSimulators are quickly becoming a critical component in the training of professionals across all fieldsThe proposed simulator is intended to be used in any environment where behavioral response audiometric testing is conductedthe foundation of most auditory assessmentsThe simulator will have the capability to connect with any audiometer and tolistento acoustic stimuli and automatically provide a detection acknowledgement to the examinerThe simulator hardware will be composed of a two channel microphone Input ModuleIMand a Stimulus Detection and Response UnitSDRUcontaining a Digital Signal ProcessorDSPused to analyze the acoustical characteristics of the sound signals presented to the simulatorThe simulator will be connected to a control Personal Computervia USB cable or Bluetooth wireless interfaceto programmed and upload different hearing configurations and psychoacoustic and age related response characteristicsPrinciples of signal detection theory will be implemented in order to provide different respondent operating profilesDuring Phase Ia prototype simulator will be constructed and the project will focus on developing and testing the simulator signal detection and receiver response characteristics softwareThese will be evaluated using benchmark testing and various automated testing algorithmsDuring Phase IIadditional expansion of the simulator capabilities will be conducted to include bone conduction testingmasking and speech audiometryDuring Phase IIthe evaluation of the simulator will also be expanded to include training performance and outcomes with audiology students The successful completion of this work will result in a training tool that will allow audiology student to quantify and improve their clinical skillsThe simulator will also standardize and broaden the exposure of students to a wide range of clinical conditions that are not typically available during trainingIn additionthe simulator will also provide an objective assessment tool to evaluate student performanceThe simulator will improve the overall learning and training experience of audiologist students which will result in improved services to patients

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

38 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,140,171. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.