SBIR/STTR Research Award

CLINIPAD: HANDHELD ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR CLINICAL TRIALS

Award identifier c6b06062f978d39114c20b059eedf58cf6861e7800c41c9ee0f10a361101bd0eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2002

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MEDICAL DECISION LOGIC INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XEL1QB1NEZX9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This Phase I application proposes to assess the feasibility of a handheld personal digital assistant (PDA) system ("CliniPadTM") designed to support multi-site clinical trials in the recording, transmission, and storage of subject assessment and rating data. Clinical subject assessment and rating data collection using handheld PDA electronic source documents (ESDs) will improve both the efficiency and quality of clinical trials. Both of these improvements will in turn increase the quality of public health, and both hold potential for commercial value in the pharmaceutical sector where clinical trials are a necessary and on-going procedure. CliniPad will present interview and rating forms to the rater on their PDA, including forms the user has created. From there the user will select subject ratings and other notations from an on-screen visual display, and the data will be stored on the PDA. Data will be transferred from the PDA to a desktop computer, and then from the desktop computer to a central Internet web server, where data from multiple trial sites will be maintained, managed, and accessible from multiple sites. On the PDA, desktop computer, and web server, the data will be encrypted, password-protected, and stored in a database. There are four basic components to the CliniPad system's end-to-end data gathering and management infrastructure: (1) a form creation application; (2) the PDA data gathering applet; (3) server-based management and communication software; and (4) a back-end database. The form creation application allows users to design their own subject rating forms. The handheld data gathering applet allows users to use these forms on their PDA to collect subject ratings. The server software will handle all form and rating data transfers between the central server and the desktop computer (and the PDA in Phase II). The back-end database will provide a central management for data from all sites, and allow role-based secure access to data. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL APPLICATION: The health industry relies on clinical trials for the marketing of its products, and a system that facilitates and improves these trials will be useful to companies dependent upon clinical trial results for income.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

36 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2020). Reported award amounts total $11,442,847. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.