SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Temperature, Superconducting, Thinfilm Coatings for RF Accelerator Cavities

Award identifier 0899cacd4e04b1e813fde1c8424b7bcb62773ce3c950683b626fcca34177a040Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ALAMEDA APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KFQ5MZYFRJ99
Solicitation number
DE-FG01-04ER04-33
Topic code
45 a

Research abstract

78840S05 Superconducting radio frequency (RF) accelerator cavities are traditionally constructed from pure Niobium metal. However, niobium is expensive and difficult to manufacture, leading to increased material and fabrication costs. Compounding the cost problem is the fact that the majority of the superconductor is wasted because the majority of the material is used to meet the mechanical strength requirements of the system, not to conduct current [i.e., the London penetration depth of the superconducting current is very thin (~60 nm), whereas the wall of the cavity must be thicker (~3 to 4 mm)]. In this project, a Coaxial Energetic Deposition (CED) process will be used to coat the inside of copper RF elliptical accelerator cavities with superconducting MgB2 films with comparable or superior accelerating gradients and quality factors to Niobium cavities, but with further reduced fabrication and operation costs due to the higher critical temperature of MgB2. Phase I will test the feasibility of using the CED process to deposit superconducting MgB2 films on the inside of elliptical RF cavities by: (1) using the CED process to coat four 5 cm inside diameter copper tubes, about 25 cm in length and several sapphire and copper witness plates with MgB2 films; (2) measuring the superconducting transition temperature and Residual Resistivity Ratio for the CED films to determine superconducting properties; (3) performing SEM and x-ray diffraction analysis to assess general film properties; and (4) coating one or more actual RF elliptical copper cavities with MgB2. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The superconducting thin film coatings for accelerator cavities should reduce the development and operating costs of particle accelerators. Thus the installation and operating costs of experimental particle physics projects will decrease while the ability to probe fundamental physics questions with higher energies will increase. In addition, the capabilities of the CED process will be further developed, which could lead to such applications as protective coatings for coal gasification, olefin manufacturing, and gun barrels for the military.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

102 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2021). Reported award amounts total $29,019,816. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.