SBIR/STTR Research Award

New Drop-in Biofuel to Meet Renewable Fuel Standards

Award identifier 891157e3e0a2932d5eb6cc6a006fbad3d23297a5379527e0199d9f983945e503Awarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
EXELUS INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
F3X4LHJZYT97
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.8

Research abstract

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 established a minimum usage volume for renewable fuels. First-generation biofuels, predominately corn-derived ethanol, served to meet the initial goals of the program. Ethanol consumption in the US reached 10.6 billion gallons last year. Ethanol has many benefits as a biofuel, with the most important being that it is a naturally occurring product of the metabolic processes of certain bacteria and yeasts. It is therefore relatively easy to produce. Massive research efforts into "cellulosic" ethanol aim to shift the viable feedstocks for ethanol production away from food crops and towards non-food biomass. However, the use of ethanol has already hit a technological ceiling. Most of the US supply of gasoline currently contains 10% ethanol (E10). Conventional vehicles cannot safely use fuels with significantly higher concentrations of ethanol without retrofits to replace gaskets and metal components susceptible to chemical attack by ethanol. To meet the Renewable Fuel Standards, the use of ethanol will have to double from current rates, rising to 20% of gasoline volume. While "Flexible Fuel" vehicles can safely utilize higher ethanol blends, they represent only a small percentage of new vehicles. This situation has led to the urgent need for "drop-in" renewable fuels. Ideally, such fuels would be chemically identical to conventional gasoline in order to limit the amount of new testing required and speed the introduction of such fuels into the market. This project seeks to develop a new chemical process that can convert ethanol produced from either conventional (corn, sugarcane) or new (biomass, municipal waste) sources into gasoline. The final product is chemically indistinguishable from petroleum-derived gasoline and can therefore be blended into the gasoline pool in any concentration. This project will develop new catalysts and chemistry that permit this transformation to occur. The work is currently at the laboratory scale, where new catalytic materials will be developed and tested to enhance their performance to commercially viable levels. If successful, this new technology will allow users to convert ethanol into a high-quality hydrocarbon fuel that will allow the inclusion of biofuels in the national gasoline supply without the current problems that plague the use of ethanol.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

39 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2025). Reported award amounts total $11,045,975. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.