SBIR/STTR Research Award

Control of Arthritic Pain by Inhibition of TRPA1 Activity

Award identifier 0e1a58217d6169622c627ba7757f0e75f40fee7140674ce5da5bfab6e9152f70Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$213,597

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2013

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Koronis Biomedical Technologies Corp.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZTSLEXFJM3J1
Solicitation number
PA12-088
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Koronis Biomedical Technologies (KBT) proposes a novel tool to test the integrity of implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) leads in-situ. Siilar to pacemakers, ICDs are surgically implanted just under the skin outside of the patient's rib cage. An ICD lead, which is a unified bundle of several insulated conductor cables, passes under the clavicle and through a vein to the chambers of the heart. While ICDs have been very effective at preventing sudden cardiac death, there have been repeated problems with ICD lead failures that have resulted in inappropriate shocks, failure to shock, ineffective cardioversion, and death. ICD leads fail over time and the longevity is difficult to predict and can be affected b the ageand activity level of a patient. Early diagnosis of ICD lead anomalies is important to reduce morbidity and/or mortality from loss of pacing, inappropriate ICD shocks, and/or ineffective treatment of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. However, existing technology for diagnosis of lead anomalies has significant limitations and shortcomings. New tools are needed. A major goal of the proposed tester is the identification of lead anomalies at the subclinical stage, before they present as a clinical problem. The proposed testing tool will be initially applied intraoperatively during ICD replacement procedures and in the future integrated directly into ICDs. Phase 1 will model, simulate, develop, and evaluate a prototype tester. Phase 2 will develop a production prototype tester and undertake efficacy evaluations in humans. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a small battery-powered electrical impulse generator that is implanted in patients who are at risk of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. The device is programmed to detect cardiac arrhythmia and correct it by delivering a jolt of electricity. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have demonstrated clear life-saving benefits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

74 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2005–2025). Reported award amounts total $36,358,935. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.