SBIR/STTR Research Award

Method for Co-Feeding Biomass and Coal for Gasification

Award identifier a6fcdf62634e93a21e5518179700918ffc1615c82357a98ae44f576f53543d2cAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
2011-03-18
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0000161
Topic code
25 b

Research abstract

Almost all of the energy consumed by the U.S. comes from fossil fuels. Essentially alltransportation fuels come from oil and most electricity is generated from coal. With essentiallyall transportation fuels coming from petroleum, and 70% of electricity coming from coal ornatural gas, it is economically and strategically in the best interest of the U.S. to developtechnologies that permit the increased use of renewable resources for producing transportationfuels and generating electricity. Because the U.S. has enough coal reserves to last about 200 years at current consumption rates, coal will be a part of our energy future. The problem of course, is that this will generate largeamounts of CO2 if the coal is simply burned or gasified. One way to decrease the amount of CO2generated when using coal, is to co-feed it with a renewable carbon source such as biomass. Thebiomass is carbon neutral, since the CO2 released when biomass is burned or gasified (or the fuelmade from biomass is burned), eventually ends up being used to grow more biomass. This is anindirect way of utilizing solar energy (which provides the energy needed by the plants to convert CO2 into cellulose) as a way to augment the production of power and fuels from coal.Future systems that convert coal into electricity or fuels will probably be gasification based,because they are clean, efficient and produce a concentrated stream of high-pressure CO2 that is relatively easy to capture for sequestration. Over 500 million tonnes of agricultural residues are produced yearly, and this biomass could be co-fed to the gasifier to reduce overall CO2 emissions. However, biomass is bulky and it is very expensive to transport it to a centrally located gasifier. Further, its bulkiness and fibrous nature makes it difficult to feed to the gasifier. In many cases, the feed system has to be custom tailored to a specific biomass feed, making the system operate poorly when the biomass feedstock is changed. TDA Research Inc. (TDA) proposes to novel method to pre-process and co-feed biomass and coal to a gasifier. Commercial Applications and Other Bene

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.