SBIR/STTR Research Award

Improved Molecular Barcodes by Lifetime Discrimination

Award identifier dcc76adefbcdaab4be126657a8d9cb61e4956651b229df5d9103ef0e55aa876bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$127,960

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SCKQA85YU4U4
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): DNA microarrays have advanced our understanding of cellular biology by their ability to simultaneously measure mRNA levels for thousands of genes. However, these microarrays are expensive to produce and quality control is a problem due to technical issues involved in reliably delivering microscopic droplets to the surface of the slide. Also, the kinetics of the binding reaction on the glass slides is slow do due mixing limitations. In order to overcome these limitations of DNA microarrays, it has been proposed to perform these assays with a large collection of tiny plastic beads, each of which is identified with a unique molecular barcode in a flow cytometer. Current barcode strategy is based upon impregnating the plastic beads with fluorescent dyes with different wavelengths and different loading intensities. Theoretically, the use of 4 different dyes with 10 different intensities would result in 10,000 barcodes. However, the emission wavelengths of neighboring dyes cannot be too close together, or light from the emission shoulders will interfere with accurate intensity measurements. In practice, Luminox, Inc. offers a set of 100 beads made with ten loading intensities at two wavelengths. RMD proposes using a similar concept, but instead basing the molecular barcode on differences in fluorescent lifetime rather than intensity. Discrimination based on fluorescent lifetimes is not nearly as sensitive to interfering signal from neighboring dyes. The major component of radiative decay can easily be deconvoluted from minor, interfering components. This will allow dyes with emission maximums close togetherto be used resulting in a higher number of barcodes. In addition, because our approach is not susceptible to the errors inherent with absolute intensity measurements, less calibration will be required and possibly more than 10 variations at each wavelength will be distinguishable. If developed, this approach will have applications in disease research. For example, large population samples could studied for responses to therapeutic treatment as correlated with genetic variations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

930 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $346,950,619. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.