SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Current Density High Repetition Rate Ferroelectric Cathode

Award identifier 124a9366a07c7d5f1925b24037621c22abe9572e94dfbc4ebb6e0cfb82786be8Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Fm Technologies Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HFGEKK4LZK93
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

150 High Current Density High Repetition Rate Ferroelectric Cathode--FM Technologies, Inc., 10529-B Braddock Road, Fairfax, VA 22032-2236; (703) 425-5111 Dr. L.K. Len, Principal Investigator Dr. Frederick M. Mako, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-97ER82376 Amount: $75,000 Aside from thermionic emission, previous methods of high-current-density electron emission for charged-particle accelerators require high extraction potentials or high-power lasers in order to extract electrons from a surface. Thermionic emitters, however, are lifetime limited when used to generate high-current-density electron beams. A solution to this problem would be a new electron source employing ferroelectric materials to generate a high-brightness, high-current density electron beam for high-power microwave devices such as klystrons and gyrotrons and for use as an injector for charged-particle accelerators. No high extraction fields, high power lasers, or high power heater supplies would be necessary. This project will extend current ferroelectric cathode technology so that a high-voltage, high repetition-rate, and long-pulse electron gun can be designed and used primarily for Stanford Linear Accelerator Center klystron gun applications. A practical electron gun will be designed that has a current density of 30 amperes per square centimeter, a 200 hertz repetition rate, and a 1-2 microsecond pulse length capable of being operated at up to 500 kilovolts. In Phase I, the ferroelectric materials will be selected, and the effects of space charge, focusing, cathode poisoning, cathode heating, and plasma formation on the source will be studied. A conceptual design of a gun system suitable for klystron applications at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center will be developed. Detailed design, fabrication, and operation of the gun system will be conducted in Phase II. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: If successful, this high-current density, high repetition-rate, long-pulse electron gun should be suitable for microwave generation and high-brightness electron sources for accelerators. It should also be suitable for commercial and research electron beam applications, including further industrial development of cathodes for pseudospark switches and ferroelectric cathodes for flat screen displays._

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

67 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2016). Reported award amounts total $21,001,147. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.