SBIR/STTR Research Award

Lo Noise Infrasonic Sensor System

Award identifier 5a7d3f521d93618e451813496463e2026ea3f0f775b4763640b9bec9391000ccAwarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Award amount

$739,152

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
Recipient company
PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
RMG1AZ1ZH8Q7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The project goal is to develop an alternative infrasound monitoring system with piezoelectric sensors for use under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. These sensors will have several advantages over the microbarograph system that forms the baseline forthe IMS. As an all-electronic system, the novel sensor would be far simpler than the baseline, with no moving parts or piping. It will be more robust and durable, less expensive, and more flexible in its design and capabilities. For example, electronicsignals do not experience delay so that subelements can be at any distance from processing unit. In Phase I, it was demonstrated that off-the-shelf PVDF piezocable could be used as an infrasound sensor but conformity with the Treaty noise specificationcould not be demonstrated. The potential reasons for this are understood. In Phase II, a revised system meeting the specifications will be developed through a combination of lower electronic amplifier noise and higher acoustic sensitivity with highsensor capacitance. This may require a change of sensors to a modified piezocable, series combinations of multiple cables or the use of PVDF cylinders. A prototype, optimizing signal and noise, suitable for the IMS application will be developed anddemonstrated in a field test. An all-electronic piezoelectric infrasound ISM array alternative would be less complex than the present design and will provide many advantages. The simpler array would likely be less susceptible to environmental factors,lower in cost both to purchase and maintain, more reliable, easier to replace, and possibly less visible and thereby less susceptible to vandalism. It also offers the prospect of novel electronic processing. If individual subelements are monitored,arrays can beamformed to provide directionality. Similarly array sections that are noisy for any reason (e.g., due to animals or other highly local phenomena) can be identified and temporarily ignored in order to maintain the signal to noise ratio for theentire array. Beyond the CTBT applications, due to their simplicity, light weight, flexibility, and low cost, piezoelectric infrasound sensors become attractive for a number of military and civilian applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

1,763 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $698,949,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.