SBIR/STTR Research Award

Liquid Hydrogen Fueling and Delivery Components

Award identifier 0670332e4870c2336038f96a6ba2a717eae00a77a04b3381162f8ea846f6f598Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
KEPNER PRODUCTS CO
Proposal award date
2024-09-10
Contract end date
2026-09-09
UEI
N72ER53SB239
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003279
Topic code
C56-18g

Research abstract

Check valves perform an important role in the liquid hydrogen infrastructure, allowing flow in only one direction and self-closing to prevent potentially damaging backward flow. Hydrogen is seen as a replacement for hydrocarbon fuels and is expected to play an important role in the future as an environmentally clean transportation fuel serving markets such as trucks, marine, rail and aircraft. Growth in liquid hydrogen fueling markets requires reducing the cost to the end user. High flow rates are necessary for filling large vehicle onboard storage to meet the customerĺs acceptable refueling time. Check valves currently offered for liquid hydrogen service are expensive and have operating inefficiencies such as reverse flow leakage, and fluid flashing and cavitation which are common with cryogenic systems and can damage system components and reduce the delivered mass flow rate. Our project entails developing an improved check valve for liquid hydrogen application that handles the problems mentioned above, aiming to improve infrastructure safety and operating efficiency for reducing delivered hydrogen cost. In Phase I work, involving leak test temperature based on cryogenic liquid nitrogen and flow tests based on water, we successfully met the projectĺs proof of concept objectives for leak-tight shutoff in the reverse flow direction at cryogenic temperature (even after thousands of operating cycles), with high mass flow rate exceeding the equivalent of DOEĺs minimum target of 10 kg/minute hydrogen, and excellent flow dynamics for reducing risks of flashing and potentially damaging fluid cavitation. In Phase 2 we will further test to refine and validate our check valve design for liquid hydrogen applications, develop a cost-efficient manufacturing process, provide a compelling value proposition, and implement our commercialization plan. Liquid hydrogen fueling is at an early commercialization stage. This clean energy market will grow with the help from system components, such as our check valve, that improve efficiencies and reduce costs. SUMMARY for Members of Congress Check valves currently offered for liquid hydrogen service are expensive and have operating inefficiencies. Our project addresses the development of an improved check valve for liquid hydrogen application that handles these inefficiencies, aiming to enhance infrastructure safety and operating efficiency for reducing delivered hydrogen cost.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2024). Reported award amounts total $1,350,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.