SBIR/STTR Research Award

Shipboard Test Chamber for Mechanical Testing of Field-Expedient Parts

Award identifier d9a1e26ae2fd06a986cab90561177840a86c850ae1106a93fda37a47d6fae96eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,966

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
PARAGON ROBOTICS LLC
Proposal award date
2024-08-27
Contract end date
2025-11-12
UEI
CG8RBJJMTVD9
Solicitation number
24.1
Topic code
N241-049

Research abstract

Navy ship platforms are currently outfitted with the capability for on-board machining, repairs, fabrication, and more recently additive manufacturing (AM). This capability is intended to increase ship self-sufficiency, and allow repairs or replacements to be manufactured for hard-to-source or obsolete parts, as well as potentially reducing costs and supply chain vulnerabilities. Especially with the increased use of AM for these tasks, the manufactured replacement typically uses a vastly different material and thus part mechanical properties compared to the original part. One way of verifying the mechanical performance of the replacement part is the use of destructive or non-destructive testing on the replacement part candidate. Testing equipment capable of testing any imaginable mechanical property has existed for over a century, so it is fairly simple to assemble a simplified test chamber which could be mounted in a shipboard environment to apply forces and measure performance data. However, there are several key challenge areas which need to be solved before a simple "plug-and-play" test apparatus could be used by shipboard sailors to validate the mechanical performance of parts: When performing strength tests, it is critical to correctly apply loads to the unit under test (UUT) in order to evaluate the true strength of the part in the installed application. In order to enable operators without an engineering background to perform these tests, software automation is needed to help assist in establishing the loading design. Once the loading design is determined, custom fixturing is typically needed to apply the loading correctly. Design of this fixturing to properly distribute loading across contact points, as well as ensuring the fixturing itself can handle the test loads, typically requires an engineering background. After the test is completed (either a destructive or non-destructive test), interpretation of the data can be difficult, as the person analyzing the data needs to understand both the requirements for the part, as well as interpreting multiple data streams to judge if the requirements were met. This SBIR project intends to demonstrate a self-contained test system, along with software and analysis capabilities, to allow a sailor to validate the mechanical performance of a field-expedient replacement part without any engineering background. If successful, the resulting test system could be installed at a multitude of Navy sites (both onship and onshore) to help usher in the greater use of AM and other field-manufactured replacement parts. Phase 1 of this project will be focused on developing the specific design for the test system, including proof-of-concept design for the integrated software applications necessary to enable start-to-finish testing. Phase 2 will involve building a prototype test apparatus, and ultimately testing it with a Navy user.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,150,253. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.