SBIR/STTR Research Award

Thermally Stable Nanoporous Membrane For PEM Fuel Cell Operated at High Temperatures

Award identifier 302ee8fcba5a741c345c408a392d8714f4fc6188c45344328040392c5a70010bAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,894

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-04-21
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-16e

Research abstract

This proposal addresses the limitations of hydrocarbon ionomers in proton exchange membranes (PEM) fuel cells. PEM fuel cells operate below 90ºC with a relative humidity greater than 70% because their perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) based membrane needs to stay hydrated. As a result, current PEMFCs are expensive because they need a high platinum-group metal (PGM) loading, an effective humidification mechanism, and a good heat rejection. These problems could be solved by replacing the PFSA-typed membrane with a high-temperature PEM membrane that allows the fuel cells to operate above 120ºC. This project will develop a thermally stable, proton-conductive, nanoporous polymer membrane for PEM fuel cells. The nanoporous polymer with interconnected ionic channels will contain and stabilize the doped phosphoric, which produces high proton conductivity even at elevated temperatures. In addition, the polymer material will be highly crosslinked to prevent membrane swelling and to resist hydrogen and oxygen crossover. In Phase I, TDA will prepare these polymers, modify their geometry, and characterize their phase formation using small-angle XRD. After coating and polymerization, we will measure the membrane mechanical properties, proton conductivity, and hydrogen crossover and correlate them to the resulting nanoporous structure. The membrane processing methods will also be varied, and process-structure-property relationships will be used to guide our development of these new membrane materials for high-temperature PEMFCs. We will use the most promising structured polymers to make membranes and prepare membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) to test in a lab-scale fuel cell (5 cm2) using hydrogen fuel and oxygen (or air). In Phase II, we will further improve our membranes, perform extended membrane durability in a hydrogen fuel cell operated at 160ºC, and scale up the production of PEMs in preparation for commercial sales. Commercial Applications include proton exchange membranes used in zero-emission vehicles and stationary fuel cell systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.