SBIR/STTR Research Award

Sustainable Biopolymer Alternatives for Fossil-Fuel Derived Foams

Award identifier 22f3a7d8a2535f64f788e5348f4310db444949b5a8e2637333a44b4056df7babAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,860

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
PHYSICAL SCIENCES INC.
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-07-21
UEI
RMG1AZ1ZH8Q7
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-13a

Research abstract

Statement of the problem or situation that is being addressed in your application. Fossil-fuel derived plastic foams are commonly used as packaging materials. These materials include expanded polystyrene, polyethylene, and polyurethane. However, the production and use of these materials is associated with high greenhouse gas emissions. Regulations are emerging in the United States and Europe that necessitate sustainable replacements to commonly used materials such as foams, adhesives, resins, and others. Ľ General statement of how this problem is being addressed. This small business will collaborate with university collaborators to develop a bio-derived foam material to replace fossil-fuel derived foams using our existing low cost, non-hazardous process. This technology produces a mechanically stable foam that can withstand repeated compression-release cycles and maintain mechanical integrity, which makes them suitable for packaging foams. The biofoam offers robust mechanical, physical, and thermal properties while being lightweight, non-toxic, and renewable. Ľ What is to be done in Phase I? In Phase I, this small business will: (1) refine the biopolymer foams for use in packaging applications, (2) vary the foam density, mechanical stiffness, and form factor to determine the optimum process for producing biopolymer foam substitutes for fossil-fuel derived packaging foam, (3) iterate upon the biopolymer foamĺs production process and test the resulting foams until the technical objectives are met, (4) create a catalogue of biofoam products with properties tailored for specific applications. Ľ Commercial Applications and Other Benefits. The current foams include expanded polystyrene foam, polyurethane foam, and polyethylene foam. The packaging market includes food &beverage packaging, electronics packaging, automotive packaging, industrial packaging, healthcare packaging and others. This small businessĺs foamĺs biodegradability and low greenhouse gas emissions are expected to be of interest primarily to eco-friendly companies that focus on ôgreenö customer appeal. We expect to work closely with eco-friendly companies and plan to reach out to foam distributors during the Phase I program.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

1,763 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $698,949,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.