SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Cost, Lightweight Doped Polymer Coatings For Microelectronics Via 3D Printing

Award identifier 477e76ff51ffcad313313cbbfe0b1d6bfab4c146d521e399c123257007115ae8Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,962

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES, INC.
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-04-21
UEI
SCKQA85YU4U4
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-03a

Research abstract

Ionizing radiation in space can damage sensitive electronics for space missions. The proliferation of space exploration requires the advancements in electronics capable of surviving harsh radiation environments present in space for a prolonged period. The traditional radiation of protecting electronics include either expensive manufacturing processes or heavy shielding that is not cost effective. An optimized material combination and innovative process to make cost- effective light-weight radiation shielding coatings is highly desired. We propose to develop light-weight coatings consisting of polymers doped with a combination of high- and low- atomic number materials for an effective shielding against space radiation, using an innovative cost-effective 3D printing process. The planned shields will be lightweight, with thickness ranging in millimeters. These coatings will offer radiation shielding effectiveness equivalent to the bulk counterpart while serving as a heat sink for electronic components. The Phase I effort will include the development of 3D printing polymer formulation with incorporation of effective shielding materials (radiation resistant polymer with addition of effective high and low atomic number materials), optimization of 3D printing process, and validation of printed coatings against ionizing radiation. Prototype light-weight plastic radiation shields with effective high and low atomic number material additions will be printed via 3D printing, and their radiation shielding effectiveness will be tested under X-ray, gamma-ray, and neutron radiation. The light-weight cost-effective radiation shields will have a myriad of applications which benefit the public. For instance, these shields will not only become necessary components for electronics on space missions, such as space shuttles, space stations and satellites, but also will be useful for more reliable portable electronic devices on earth under various harsh environments. It will directly enhance the quality of telecommunications and hence the quality of life.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

930 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $346,950,619. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.