SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reactive CO2 Capture and Conversion in Underutilzied Waste Streams to Make Synthetic Aggregates for Concrete

Award identifier d50115173cde7a4996d03064c82cebf8824b5eb2a80ba1f5d4e960e38ed07ad9Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
C-CRETE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2024-07-22
Contract end date
2025-07-21
UEI
K8VKEEUXLF95
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003202
Topic code
C58-23a

Research abstract

Deep decarbonization of the industrial sector (steel plants, cement plants, H2 production plants, etc) poses a significant challenge. The conventional CO2 capture approach is to first separate/capture CO2 from process emissions or pre/post-combustion flue gases and then, as applicable, to regenerate the capture medium (e.g. amines) and to compress, transport, and store or otherwise utilize the purified CO2 in other applications. The act of capturing CO2 in this method is often accompanied downstream by energy intensive and costly support infrastructure and processes to capture, purify, compress, transport and/or store the captured CO2, and to regenerate the capture medium. It is thus highly desired in terms of energy efficiencies and costs to employ a ôreactive captureö approach to carbon capture. In the reactive capture approach, the act of capturing CO2 and converting it into a higher value product is integrated into one continuous process onsite ľ thus eliminating the potential need to separately regenerate the capture medium and the need to purify, compress, transport, or store the captured CO2. Capitalizing on our promising lab scale results, the overarching objective of this project is to demonstrate mineralization of CO2 from point sources into underutilized waste streams to create synthetic carbonnegative aggregates for use in concrete. The phase I SBIR project will optimize our processes to accommodate gas stream from industrial point sources (with similar temperature, pressure, composition, contaminant, impurities, etc), followed by standard testing of the produced aggregates and performing preliminary TEA/LCA for comparison to incumbent aggregates. The goal is to have at least 25% lower life cycle emissions versus incumbent aggerates from cradle to gate basis (A1-A3). In phase II, we will optimize our process yield, scale-up our technology to work with actual gas streams of industrial plants and perform pilot testing on a large concrete slab to demonstrate real world application. C-Creteĺs experience in projects with similar complexity along with our state-of-the-art facilities and equipment and relationships with key industry players will catalyze our commercialization efforts.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

15 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2024). Reported award amounts total $5,975,968. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.