SBIR/STTR Research Award

Passive Aircraft Avoidance through EO/IR Imaging and Reconfigured TBAD

Award identifier 990597d5ce7a1bdc7f0e18ff7a8ae9cabaebe404b27248892739fab227b3be58Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,898,279

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
HART SCIENTIFIC CONSULTING INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.
Proposal award date
2024-07-02
Contract end date
2026-04-03
UEI
XAMFC886KSM5
Solicitation number
23.3
Topic code
SF233-D006

Research abstract

Laser-guided adaptive optics (AO) is an essential tool for ground-based telescopes tasked with carrying out observations in support of space domain awareness (SDA) objectives. AO removes the blur imposed by the turbulent atmosphere and enables both high-resolution and high-contrast imaging. However, laser guide stars (LGS) used in support of AO present significant technical and operational challenges. Of critical importance is the issue of safety, since the lasers used to make LGS are Class IV with typical output power of tens of watts. Great care must be taken not to illuminate aircraft in navigable airspace. To protect air traffic, human spotters have in the past often been used with the FAAĺs blessing. This is a risky approach however: people are all too easily distracted or become tired, and it is also very difficult to identify aircraft at night that may not be using lights (a not uncommon occurrence for military training missions for all but the lead ship). During the day, aircraft are often difficult to see even when they can be heard. For these reasons, the FAA has recognized that automated aircraft detection systems are simply more robust and reliable than people. In this Direct to Phase II program, HartSCI will design, build, deliver, and demonstrate a comprehensive and flexible automated system for aircraft protection. The Automated Aircraft Deconfliction System (AADS) exploits several independent modalities to provide robustness and redundancy. Included in the architecture is a modified Transponder-Based Aircraft Detector (TBAD) antenna array configured for telescopes of 1-2 m diameter, as well as passive EO and thermal IR imaging. Additional input sources include E-stop and human-held kill switches, and future expansion is anticipated to allow for feeds from FAA Air Route Surveillance Radar (ARSR) and Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facilities where available. The AADS will be tested against known aircraft in the vicinity of HartSCIĺs offices in Tucson before being delivered to the government. HartSCI personnel will then be available to assist in deploying and demonstrating the system at a government observatory, and to transition it to service.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2009–2024). Reported award amounts total $18,123,553. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.