SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wearable Textile-Based Haptic Communication Device with Interactive Display

Award identifier e5308e5529c0efa000706e69b5186542dc3927c18b80626c9e8eb46d16b863daAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$1,899,958

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
DOTBLISS LLC
Proposal award date
2024-07-01
Contract end date
2025-12-16
UEI
WJCXJC2SAHC5
Solicitation number
23.4
Topic code
A234-P015

Research abstract

Using traditional, textile screen-printing techniques, DotBliss applies multiple layers of functionalized, electronically active inks to create three-dimensional electronic composites, producing interactive touch displays, controls, and haptic feedback systems on a flexible fabric base.Ā The functionality we create is similar to the interactive displays of smartphones. Our fabric-based systems are currently about one-quarter the resolution of the original iPhone screens circa 2006. Our controllable displays exhibit flexibility, crush-ability, cuttability, and sew-ability, akin to conventional fabrics.Ā The goal of this Direct-to-Phase II SBIR is to improve communication between squad members and squad leaders in the operational environment. The technical approach to solving this problem is to build a visual and haptic device for a warfighter to wear on their forearm. The body-worn device will be a lightweight, fabric-based device that receives and provides haptic (touch) feedback and displays instructions to a warfighter. Currently, our warfighters in the field are using TAK, a tactical assault communications kit that typically uses an Android phone. The phone is attached to the vest and the soldier must look downward at this phone and use his arms at a convoluted angle in order to type and interact with the phone. As described by the PEO Soldier Survivability Office, this system causes 4 distinct difficulties in the field. Looking down, the warfighter loses situational awareness. While interacting with the phone, the warfighter is not prepared with his/her Āweapon.Ā The weight of the phone and its location limit the movement of the warfighter. The bright backlight from the phone illuminates the warfighter making them visible in the dark. These 4 problems lead to survivability, lethality and maneuverability issues. Our proposed enhancement of TAK provides an alternative communication interface that maintains situational awareness, limits light emission and provides for covert communication.ĀAs an addition to the TAK system, we will print a display on a fabric sleeve that can be worn on the forearm. This "quarterback sleeve" would allow the warfighters to wear a display on their arm which is supporting their weapon, so their arm is extended and their heads are always up and prepared to take action. The haptic communication is completely covert ¢ no light and no sound. The objectives of this SBIR: The first is to understand how effective haptic communication via a forearm sleeve is in providing direction and navigation in the operational environment. The second is to learn the usefulness of a visual display on the forearm in addition to or instead of a phone-based TAK display for an individual warfighter.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.