SBIR/STTR Research Award

Preclinical Development of a ME-1001, a Synthetic Lung Surfactant

Award identifier f8c33000bd6a617b8a663a1d585e699f0ec1ffb950fc5708ef41717632e946b1Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,999,637

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
MOLECULAR EXPRESS, INC
Proposal award date
2024-05-15
Contract end date
2026-04-30
UEI
R1JMHFESEKD5
Solicitation number
PA23-230
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

Project Summary/Abstract Surfactant deficiency in preterm infants causes the neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). NRDS directly causes mortality and morbidity. NRDS also increases the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and nosocomial infections. The burden of NRDS has been conservatively estimated at 1% of all live births, or 1.4 million neonates globally, with a reported case fatality for untreated NRDS of 57 to 89% in low- and middle-income countries. Although animal-derived surfactants for treating NRDS developed in the 1980s greatly decreased preterm infant morbidity and mortality, fewer than one-third of premature infants receive surfactant treatment (based on surfactant sales). Cost constraints and lack of supply are primary factors for why the remaining two-thirds are not treated. To help fill this need, Molecular Express, Inc. is completing the late-stage development and preclinical activities for ME-1001, an investigational lung surfactant comprised of the Super Mini-B peptide, which mimics Surfactant Protein B, the protein component primarily responsible for lung surfactant activity, as well as the three major lipids of natural human lung surfactant. ME-1001 is a fully synthetic lung surfactant - i.e., it is not limited by supply as is the case with animal derived products and has significant advantages in being well-defined with consistent activity, product uniformity, and economy of manufacturing over currently marketed animal and synthetic lung surfactants. In this SBIR Phase II application, the Company will perform the pre-clinical activities that are needed to advance ME-1001 into the clinic. Successful execution of the proposed activities will advance the development of a synthetic lung surfactant with commercial attractiveness due to advantages over other synthetic and native surfactants in activity and manufacturing economy. Reduced cost to consumers can potentially translate into broadened surfactant treatment of NRDS and potentially other indications for use thus exerting a significant impact on improving global public health.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

55 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2024). Reported award amounts total $36,762,517. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.