SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wireless Smart Thermal Protection System (TPS) for USSF Space Vehicles

Award identifier c9a9e201bdacd50d53371af347c83ccb0316e8bb4a15c1fd303724d30503934dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,166,584

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CANOPY AEROSPACE, INC.
Proposal award date
2024-02-09
Contract end date
2025-11-10
UEI
JDFXCPKV3BB4
Solicitation number
X23.5
Topic code
AFX235-CSO1

Research abstract

February 1, 2003 – the Columbia Space Shuttle, traveling 18x faster than the speed of sound, was heading back to Earth. Upon re-entry, the space shuttle reached temperatures of up to 2691 °F, and a critical failure of its Thermal Protection System (TPS) caused white-hot plasma to penetrate the shuttle, claiming the lives of the seven astronauts on board—a tragedy that could have been avoided. November 21, 2003 – the Space Shuttle has not flown since 2011, and the supply base for critical capabilities in the United States like thermal protection systems has dried up. This results not only in difficulty for the DOD to procure TPS, but a general lack of applied innovation normally spurred by commercial activity. Despite these supply chain constraints, the need for TPS within the defense industrial base and emerging commercial space economy has skyrocketed due to recent technological advances and the pacing threat of advanced nations like China. A DAF required innovation in TPS is the integration of wireless, ‘smart sensing,’ capabilities; the monitoring systems and real-time responsive data are critical to USAF/USSF vehicle systems and can keep Airmen and Guardians safe, ensuring mission integrity. Canopy’s wireless integrated sensors can monitor temperature and structural integrity of TPS, displacing the need for traditional wired sensors, leading to better predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring – reducing the risk of catastrophic failure. It's imperative that safety of flight be advanced for future space flight. Canopy will execute a 21-month Phase II effort to develop a prototype of the Smart Wireless TPS Sensor for AFRL/RV and qualify it via ground testing facilities in the United States. Canopy will study sensor-material compatibility, determine suitable manufacturing routes for embedding sensors, and design the hardware architecture. The project will culminate with simulated flight testing of the prototype, proving functionality through exposure to high aerothermal loading. The Phase II results will prove out key hypotheses related to better predictive maintenance – reduced catastrophic failure, increased performance, fuel efficiency, and overall increased safety of flight for vehicles. Afterward, Canopy’s Smart TPS technology will be ready for initial flight testing in 2025.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2023–2025). Reported award amounts total $8,708,923. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.