SBIR/STTR Research Award

Effects of Surface Roughness Patterns on Hypersonic Boundary-layer Stability and Transition

Award identifier ee993594fe99600dfdde58966b148ab0ffc30790fce313efb64cb2e3a39ffd44Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$999,474

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SPECTRAL ENERGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2024-02-06
Contract end date
2026-01-30
UEI
C3DAVH4VJDG3
Solicitation number
20.2
Topic code
N202-141

Research abstract

This effort will characterize the effects of selected roughness, gap, and other surface defect modalities on laminar-to-turbulent transition at hypersonic speeds on baseline geometries as well as a Navy-relevant configuration with fins to be selected in consultation with the program managers. The end result, in a comprehensive program over Phase II Base and Phase II Option, will be a methodology for analyzing, both computationally and via low-disturbance hypersonic wind tunnel experiments, specific roughness/defect patterns and predicting/measuring their effect on transition. Specific products will include a critical assessment of roughness effects on transition mechanisms pertinent to a relevant geometry with features to include at least one fin, scaling methodology to relate subscale wind tunnel experiment to flight, impact at selected critical roughness locations, wind tunnel noise and parametric effects such as (for example) nose bluntness and angle of attack. SE partner Purdue University will measure and characterize roughness/gap/flaw patterns from Navy-provided material samples and specify the representative defect properties to be reproduced in wind tunnel models to be fabricated by SE for evaluation in the low-disturbance Purdue BAM6QT. SE partner NIA/ NASA will compute the stability characteristics of selected basic state(s) as well as the receptivity to selected roughness patterns for this effort. The team will evaluate these features experimentally at Mach 6 and computationally at Mach 6 and other Mach numbers specified by the Navy sponsors as relevant. Pending funding, progress, and facility availability, additional analysis may include: 1) the effects of blowing/gas injection to simulate ablative mass transfer, potentially in conjunction with roughness; 2) experimental evaluation of different Mach numbers; and/or 3) inputs into flight experiment design (e.g., MACH-TB).Ā In Phase II Option the developed approach will be extended to predict, fabricate, and analyze roughness patterns capable of suppressing relevant instabilities that may lead to transition.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

272 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2026). Reported award amounts total $120,780,215. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.