SBIR/STTR Research Award

A234-028_TETAC Energetic Remote Breaching Solutions

Award identifier ffa28d4896c42ae5b00633c5496d66c2023a25d14e7c4cfe3393afe2189793c1Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$75,021

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2024

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
Tetac Inc.
Proposal award date
2024-01-30
Contract end date
2024-04-29
UEI
MRHPK9KR3TH6
Solicitation number
23.4
Topic code
A234-028

Research abstract

The Army has a requirement to remove the soldier from the point of breach and to increase breaching capabilities for mines and other obstacles. The focus of the need is on technologies for creating a breach lane in a fast-paced, contested combat environment. During discussions with the Army SBIR and GOBLN Program Managers, TETAC learned the following: ĀĢ The GOBLN Program of Record utilizes 81mm projectiles in combination with a sensor suite located on the R80 FLIR SkyRaider to detect and neutralize mine threats. ĀĢ The ideal lane is cleared from 1 kilometer or more and measures about 9 meters wide x 150 meters long. Ā ĀĢ Modular energetic payloads are of interest to defeat a variety of targets such as mines, concertina wire, dragon teeth, or other barricades. Reduction of ferrous materials, when compared to the 81mm projectile, is of interest to assist with the ease of proofing the lane after obstacle defeat. Ā Ģ The Army is seeking to enhance sensors, energetics, proofing, marking technologies, and remote technologies, such as aerial drones to increase standoff. Ā Ģ The Army is planning to utilize a cohort approach to develop additional capabilities.Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā ĀĀ TETAC is interested in collaborating with industry to assist in the development of a comprehensive remote breaching solution to meet Army requirements. More specifically, our interest is to focus on energetic payloads, neutralization of explosive ordnance, and fire control systems as a member of the cohort. Our companyÆs core capabilities reside in Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), energetic obstacle defeat, and unmanned system payload integration. We believe we can assist the cohort in developing and executing a Phase II demonstration based on our past performance, explosive expertise, and industry connections. TETAC proposes working within a collaborative cohort environment as the explosive subject matter experts to assist in defining the mission and to develop a comprehensive approach for remote breaching. Our proposed technical approach is to develop and integrate modular and variable mission specific payloads and firing systems to support energetic breaching concepts defined during the cohort Phase I planning stages. Upon defining the requirements, TETAC will work to develop a Phase II project schedule to demonstrate mine/ordnance neutralization and obstacle defeat during a Phase II live fire demonstration.Ā

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $5,736,261. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.