SBIR/STTR Research Award

Large-Area Superconducting Tape Processing Using Novel Inverted Cylindrical Magnetron PVD/Etch/e-CVD Technique

Award identifier e5a1e08f409f5aa29f0faa682e87304c4111c35dbfb81a849c3dcf5433008945Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
STARFIRE INDUSTRIES, LLC
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-04-09
UEI
GZ2MY2S55JW9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002903
Topic code
C56-30a

Research abstract

This SBIR project addresses the need for scalable manufacturing techniques for high-quality coatings on Gen2.5 rare-earth barium copper oxide (REBCO) high-temperature superconducting (HTS) tapes needed for high-beta magnetic containment nuclear fusion concepts. Volumetric fusion power density is proportional to B4, so a doubling in current leads to a factor of 16× reduction in size/economics or increase in energy output. With demonstrable peak currents approaching >1kA/mm2 and strength to sustain high B-field force, the demand for HTS tape has exploded; however, costs remain high.The SBIR technical approach is targeting two pain points related to PVD deposition of the Ag stabilizer/contact layer (costly $$$, low target utilization, high thickness) and replacing Cu electroplating around the tape assembly with an all PVD quasi-conformal approach. These pain points are coupled because due to the reactive nature of the Cu electroplating bath, the Ag stabilizer layer must be sufficiently thick enough to resist penetration, corrosion and oxygen-depletion of the underlying REBCO active layer. Consequently, several microns of Ag are typically used whereas only 100nm would suffice leading to additional cost ($/kA-m) and overall tape thickness (magnet peak B-field achievable).The opportunity presents to leverage a technology developed for precision coatings for accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings as a solution for these pain points that is scalable for high-volume manufacturing. This SBIR seeks to validate the technical approach with university involvement.A successful SBIR/STTR will target critical pain points and barriers to help lower the cost and increase manufacturing capacity for Gen2.5-HTS tape for high-strength superconducting magnets. The anticipated public benefit is greater access to electricity and distribution, plus modest improvements in medical diagnostic imaging (MRI) from the availability of intense superconducting magnetic technology. Lastly, we can bury the adage that “fusion is always 30 years away” and increase domestic manufacturing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

61 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2025). Reported award amounts total $32,483,674. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.