SBIR/STTR Research Award

Classification Approach for Assessing Spacecraft Threats (CAAST)

Award identifier b57717726d2ed7ff72f53f09fbe2efa169df1d9b05d9a27f0de95e7b0d679620Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,923

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TRUSTED SPACE, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-12-15
Contract end date
2023-09-15
UEI
CK8EVP1Y1UL9
Solicitation number
22.B
Topic code
SF22B-T001

Research abstract

Battlespace awareness within the space domain is a critical foundation for planning appropriate courses of action, responding to threats, protecting vulnerable assets, and preparing contingency plans. The ability to maintain flexible deterrent options in various situations relies upon maintaining an accurate picture of (1) what is happening now, and (2) what could happen in the future. Because the set of future possibilities is infinite, it is important to broadly characterize these possibilities and to best understand those which require a response or present the greatest threats to our assets. For this Phase I STTR, we propose to develop and test a Classification Approach for Assessing Spacecraft Threats (CAAST) that accounts for non-gaussian spacecraft state uncertainties and provides a probabilistic assessment of adversary co-orbital COAs as kinetic threat possible or kinetic threat not possible. We will develop a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Model with Gaussian Mixture uncertainties algorithm that accounts for adversary/asset state uncertainty, quantifies confidence in the threat assessment, and drastically reduces computation time compared with existing reachability solutions. The significant reduction in computation time will enable threat characterization for many adversary/asset pairs at once. Threat characterization on this scale is not currently possible due to computational intractability of existing tools. Our Phase I solution will focus on impulsive maneuvers at the start of the adversary trajectory, will focus on 2-body dynamics with use cases originating beyond GEO and terminating in GEO, and will classify threats as kinetic threat possible vs. kinetic threat not possible. Our Phase II solution will expand on the Phase I proof-of-concept to encompass all adversary thrust profiles, three body dynamics, all orbital regimes, and threat classification between kinetic threat, non-kinetic threat, and non-threatening. Our combined Trusted Space and CUBRC team has significant experience developing tools for spacecraft threat assessment, reachability analysis, and hypothesis management. Our teams also have experience working in operational Aerospace environments and bring a deep understanding of operator needs to this proposed work.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $9,196,220. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.