SBIR/STTR Research Award

A New Sorbent Process for Transformational Carbon Capture Process

Award identifier 853133b2e60be3a60393171a07138e0e15181b1f872d9ebbcc3cc30961d44268Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TDA RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2022-08-22
Contract end date
2024-08-21
UEI
MK5ANJVWVZK7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C46-18d

Research abstract

Although there are several methods for separating CO2 from the flue gases, all have significant drawbacks, including loss of efficiency and increased capital and operating costs (compared to no CO2 capture) that dramatically increase the cost of electricity. In this SBIR Contract TDA Research, Inc. (TDA), in collaboration with Membrane Technology Research Corporation (MTR), is developing a high capacity, highly selective engineered polymer sorbent to selectively CO2 from the flue gases of coal-fired power plants. In Phase I we prepared various sorbent formulations and screened them to determine their capacity to adsorb CO2 and completed a preliminary design of our carbon capture system (CCS). In Phase II we continued to optimize the sorbent to enhance its CO2 capacity and scaled-up its production. We then assessed the performance of the sorbent beads in a 2-5 scfm unit using simulated flue gas. We also prepared these sorbents in laminates to reduce the pressure drop and keep the mass and heat transfer distances small, allowing them to be cycled rapidly. Our sorbent is now scheduled for a field test at Wyoming Integrated Test Center (WITC) under actual coal-derived flue gas. Next we will run extended cycling tests with our sorbent. We completed a technoeconomic analysis showing TDA’s sorbent technology can capture CO2 at a cost of $28.9/tonne (meeting DOE target for transformational CCS). TDA, in collaboration with MTR, will scale-up the production of the sorbent laminates and further develop the rapid cycling process to capture CO2 from flue gas. This innovation will significantly lower the size of the sorbent beds and the CAPEX. We will then test these scaled-up sorbent laminate modules in our 10-50 scfm prototype unit to complete the proof-of-concept demonstrations in a multi-bed system, demonstrating high CO2 capture (>95%) and high CO2 purity (>95%) with both simulated (at TDA) and the actual coal derived flue gas (at the WITC), elevating to TRL 5. CO2 is a major greenhouse gas and power generation is a major source of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. It is the result of the combustion of fossil fuels, in particular the burning of coal to generate electricity. The proposed technology will provide a cost effective way to control CO2 emissions.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

951 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2026). Reported award amounts total $317,960,224. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.