SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reverse Engineering Technical Data Packages for Development of Alternate Source of Supply for DLA NSNs

Award identifier acf361e5ffd409a4b122626d78bbbf20c1702a763a54b010cfc9acab18b2d3b3Awarding agency Department of Defense · Defense Logistics Agency

Award amount

$1,249,305

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Defense Logistics Agency
Recipient company
DeVal Life Cycle Support, LLC
Proposal award date
2022-08-22
Contract end date
2023-08-21
UEI
CKMJDECPCZ63
Solicitation number
20.1
Topic code
DLA201-001

Research abstract

DeVal Lifecycle Support has utilized its success in the existing SBIR program to replicate various items in need of source of supply. Using the company's unique and revolutionary R.O.P.E. (Rapid Obsolescence Planning and Execution) process to create entire technical drawing packages and manufacturing drawing packages, Deval has created a solution to the problem that has become increasingly more critical for the availability some of the most critical NSNs for the USAF and Navy. All of the drawings, specifications, sources, and all inspection data developed in previous projects have been completed in their entirety, and have been given final SAR approval by various ESA's allowing Deval Lifecycle Support to manufacture mission critical items. Because of this, the DLA has successfully gained a new source of supply for these mission critical items. All materials, equipment, management, measurements, environment/testing, and manpower developed in previous projects are focused on meeting and exceeding the expectations of the DOD's engineering community. For this phase II, Deval Lifecycle Support is proposing to improve product availability and increase competition through the development of Source Approval Requests (SAR) and first article samples where required for NSN 2840-01-573-1640 Spacer, Turbine Rotor, Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine, NSN 5930-00-503-3850 Switch, NSN 5930-00-539-7660 – Switch, NSN 5930-01-038-0574 Switch, NSN 6340-00-135-7482 Connector Assy, NSN 6210-00-229-3028 Indicator Light Filter, NSN 5945-99-372-4096, NSN 6230-01-442-1610 Portable Light Assembly, NSN 4310-01-436-1303, P/N 3573AS120-1, NSN 4310-01-584-3052 HOOD ASSEMBLY, NSN 4310-01-584-3047 Exhaust Assembly, NSN 5961-01-627-4673 Transistor,  NSN 5961-01-627-3615 Transistor, NSN 2510-01-518-7618 FENDER, VEHICULAR, NSN 2590-01-682-9001, NSN 2530-01-289-9731 ARM, STEERING GEAR, NSN 5960-01-613-6131 Trailer A0 Tire NRP, and NSN 2840-01-573-1640 Spacer, Turbine Rotor, Aircraft Gas Turbine Engine through reverse engineering efforts. The intent is that upon SAR Approval, by an ESA, Deval Lifecycle Support will be responsive to future solicitations as well as participate in the development of additional SARs for technically related NSNs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2023). Reported award amounts total $4,186,348. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.