SBIR/STTR Research Award

Efficient and scalable microfluidic gene delivery to hematopoietic stem cells to treat blood diseases

Award identifier 87c99809bbea6ca616a7d0e4ca209dda141077ee10cd7a2449ebcb22dbeece43Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,680,456

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CELLFE, INC
Proposal award date
2022-07-01
Contract end date
2024-06-30
UEI
M34JNT47EKK3
Solicitation number
PA20-260
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

Abstract The two dominant methods for delivering genome modifying molecules to cells for cell therapies, viral transduction and electroporation transfection, have process and technical limitations that hamper the development of cutting-edge cell therapies accessible to all. While viral vectors result in a high cost of goods with significant regulatory and health risks associated with manufacturing, electroporation results in unhealthy cells with low viability and off-target phenotype changes. CellFE’s microfluidic VECT technology enables cell transfections with high transfection efficiency, low off-target changes to the cell, and with an expanded cell processing range. This project aims to demonstrate the first commercial cell transfection platform designed for scalable ex vivo genetic modification of CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) to develop treatments of genetic and infectious diseases including beta thalassemia, sickle cell disease, hemophilia, and HIV. Scalability means that process parameters used in the research and development phase of cell engineering will immediately apply to clinical scale (300-fold increase in number of processed cells) by simply exchanging a chip. A simpler manufacturing scale-up means a faster path to clinical testing and will be a significant value proposition for the technology. To achieve these goals, CellFE will pursue the following aims: (1) determine the optimal design to scaleup device channels for high-throughput, (2) transfer device fabrication from PDMS to injection molded plastic, (3) demonstrate genetic modification of a therapeutic gene at bench-top at a clinical processing rate, and (4) develop alpha prototype systems for testing in the labs of our pharmaceutical partners to generate paid pilot studies. These are the key technical aims of the SBIR Phase II project and are also the main milestones CellFE needs to accomplish in order to execute its business plan of developing, marketing, and selling cell transfection platforms for cell therapy manufacturing with the prospect to de-risk manufacturing development and reduce cost of goods versus current delivery techniques.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,861,931. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.