SBIR/STTR Research Award

High-Efficiency Compact Heat Exchangers and Condensers for Small Modular Energy Systems

Award identifier 66ca0c3e6e1ec755ad1066e06c77c86cb772d5d2ac5de457123179713b6a8d17Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$206,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ULTRAMET
Proposal award date
2022-06-27
Contract end date
2023-03-26
UEI
N8ZRMWX85NZ6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C54-36m

Research abstract

Statement of the problem or situation that is being addressed: Regardless of the design type, small modular reactors used for power generation require small components and small footprints in order to be economically viable. This is particularly true for the heat rejection equipment, which can be quite large. Furthermore, if the plant is located in an area where cooling water is prohibitively expensive or simply unavailable, dry cooling will be required. Graphite foams derived from pitch have been tested for dry cooling, but because those materials had very high pressure drops and hence low permeability with respect to air flow, their internal volume and surface area were not effectively used, and they performed poorly. Statement of how this problem or situation is being addressed: Foam with a more open structure will increase the permeability, greatly enhance air flow through the bulk material, increase the rate of heat transfer, and enable the material to outperform traditional fin structures. In recent work for DOE, Ultramet developed high-performance, air-cooled graphite foam heat exchangers for use in both fossil and nuclear power plants located in desert environments where cooling water is not available. Whereas graphite foams made via conventional processes have high densities and high pressure drops, graphite foams made by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) have pressure drops that are orders of magnitude lower. This enables the cooling air to permeate the entire foam volume, thus taking full advantage of its high internal surface area for heat transfer. Various foam architectures have been developed and tested, and at an air-side pressure drop of 1 in H2O, the measured heat transfer coefficient is 3.5 times greater than that of similarly sized high-performance aluminum fins. What is to be done in Phase I? Using heat transfer and pressure drop models developed in previous work, foam-based air-cooled condensers/coolers will be designed for near-term use with small modular reactors. Flow sheets will be developed for the different types of plants, the operating conditions and heat rejection requirements will be quantified, one system will be downselected, foam architectures will be developed specifically for that plant type, and a series of subscale heat exchanger cores using those architectures will be fabricated and tested. The resulting data will be used to refine the existing models and pave the way for scaleup. Commercial applications and other benefits: Heat rejection equipment for small modular reactors will be the primary market for this technology, but it can easily be scaled up to include industrial and utility power plants (both nuclear and fossil fuel), petrochemical refineries, and chemical process installations. Smaller applications include heat exchangers used by the military in desert environments (e.g. air conditioners, environmental control units, heat exchangers for radars).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

380 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $105,154,309. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.