SBIR/STTR Research Award

Mitofusin Agonists to Treat Neurodegenerative Disease

Award identifier 01d9bd5d325bc459b5e86d18fef4800cf423d5f4ffd3fe10fbb9ce5bb36a6987Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,954,883

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Mitochondria in Motion, Inc.
Proposal award date
2022-05-15
Contract end date
2024-04-30
UEI
XBL8JCNQJB46
Solicitation number
PA20-265
Topic code
104

Research abstract

Mitofusin agonists for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases Gerald W Dorn II, MD Mitochondria in Motion, Inc. Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine Abstract: A number of rare neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by mitochondrial fragmentation, dysmotility and dysfunction. Among these are Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington’s Disease (HD), which cause significant morbidity and mortality in affected populations and for which there are no available disease-altering therapies. With Phase I STTR support, Mitochondria in Motion, Inc. (MiM) has developed the first pharmaceutically acceptable small molecule mitofusin activators to treat these and other neurodegenerative conditions with underlying contributory mitochondrial pathology. Mitofusin activation enhances mitochondrial fitness, metabolism and trafficking within diseased neurons, thereby improving homeostatic functioning, conferring resistance to injury and promoting neuronal repair/regrowth. During phase I we hypothesized that intervention with a mitofusin activator would have beneficial effects on etiologically diverse genetic peripheral neuropathies with a mitochondrial component. This notion was validated by phase I studies and MiM is advancing 2 pre-clinical lead mitofusin activators, CPR1-B for sustained activation in genetically heterogenous diseases like ALS and HD not caused by mitofusin (MFN) mutations, and MiM-111 for “burst” activation in Charcot-Marie- Tooth disease type 2A (CMT2A) that is directly caused by mutations in MFN2. Having identified CPR1-B as a clinical candidate in non-CMT2A neuropathies like ALS and HD, our Phase II goals are to initiate non GMP pre-IND studies positioning us for FDA IND approval (Aim 1) and define optimal CPR1-B dosing levels and schedule in ALS and HD mouse models (Aim 2). If successful we will fill an unmet healthcare need and build a commercial enterprise to serve the ~20,000 Americans with ALS and the ~150,000 Americans suffering from or at genetic risk for developing HD, their caregivers and families. Our deliverable in Phase II will be a mitofusin activator positioned for FDA IND approval and phase 1 first-in-human trials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2022). Reported award amounts total $4,727,501. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.