SBIR/STTR Research Award

Manufacturability Study for Flexible Printed RF Elements

Award identifier 26f00d93d46680b974545548fe65c5e323a54e684f53d9efa1b2c38eed24517eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$1,484,428

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
APPLIED NANOTECH, INC.
Proposal award date
2022-05-05
Contract end date
2024-05-04
UEI
HG7NJV44ZM65
Solicitation number
20.2
Topic code
MDA20-008

Research abstract

Significant effort has been expended into the advancement of flexible, additively manufactured (AM) electronic systems. Less well studied are the effects of additively manufactured RF elements such as antennas, waveguides, and their required interconnects. Primarily, with respect to AM RF elements there is insufficient engineering data to rationally choose the ink materials and substrates and corresponding AM production process to predict the resulting RF and thermal system performance. There is an unmet need for the characterization of the RF performance of additively manufactured antennas and wave guides using additively produced conductors on various flexible substrate types and an unmet need for known-good antenna using only non-destructive characterization. In Phase II, utilizing the materials and techniques developed in Phase I, we will prototype and demonstrate its ability to meet the program requirements defined as (1) Produce test coupons in quantities established in Phase I. (2) Determine void sizes and densities in the material sets test coupons. (3) Conduct a characterization test plan on all test coupons at -40°C, 25°C, and 125°C with power levels of 1W, 25W, and 50W. Traditional evaluation methods such as destructive testing of samples at high power are not applicable due to small batch sizes and inconsistency of performance, so a new evaluation technique is needed. One aim of this project is to produce optimized ink/substrate pairing for optimal printed RF performances, including conformal printing. Another aim of this project is an improved predictive evaluation of AM printed electronic systems using Machine Learning (ML) image classification from optical profilometry output and other non-destructive test methods. Specifically, we focus on fundamental analysis of additive electronics for DC or RF applications. Another aim of this project is to develop temperature-compensating antennas that will lead to more reliable RF performance at higher temperatures encountered in MDA and DOD (e.g., hypersonic) applications. Approved for Public Release | 22-MDA-11102 (22 Mar 22)

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

80 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2025). Reported award amounts total $27,382,369. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.