SBIR/STTR Research Award

A new medium field superconducting magnet for the EIC

Award identifier e108f816685ffec8cfd0b1fde0deb8a23f62523caf66b8eb0a42636c79f20eabAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,150,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
PARTICLE BEAM LASERS, INC.
Proposal award date
2022-04-04
Contract end date
2024-04-03
UEI
CHPCR17Y8LK3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C51-37g

Research abstract

The length of most accelerator magnets is much greater than the diameter, and therefore the loss in effective length from the ends (about a coil diameter in dipoles) is relatively small. However, for short magnets, such as some envisioned for the Interaction Region (IR) of the Electron Ion Collider (EIC), the end effects of the conventional cosine theta design will result in a relatively large reduction in magnetic length. This proposal is for developing an alternate optimum integral design which significantly reduces the loss of effective length due to the ends. In the optimum integral design approach, the ends become an integral part of the magnet in optimizing the cosine theta current distribution, thereby creating a higher integral field for the same coil length. The more compact design is critical when available space is limited as in the EIC. As a part of Phase I, we ported and further developed the codes for optimizing the optimum integral design. The lower cost of direct wind technology allowed us to design, build, and successfully test a proof-of-principle 1.7 T, 114 mm aperture, 600 mm long, 2-layer superconducting dipole based on the optimum integral design, a significant feat for a Phase I program. The goal of Phase II will be to demonstrate the optimum integral design for EIC IR dipole B0ApF. This will be a 3.8 T, 114 mm aperture, 600 mm long superconducting dipole, which is well beyond what has been demonstrated with direct wind technology so far. The magnet will also meet the field quality requirements. It is an ambitious goal for an SBIR/STTR program but one that we believe can be achieved based on the strong performance of Phase I. Finally, we will examine the applicability of the optimum integral design to other EIC magnets and for other applications, such as medical and accelerator beam lines where compact, medium field superconducting magnets are required. A direct wind magnet based on the optimum integral design will create higher quality fields and have lower adverse end effects than conventional designs making it ideal for uses wherein space is at a premium. Demonstration of the direct wind magnet based on the optimum integral design is expected to provide a superior technical solution and reduce the cost of developing and building such magnets. These magnets should find widespread use in particle accelerators for research and medical applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2022). Reported award amounts total $5,923,734. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.