SBIR/STTR Research Award

Automated Systematic Reviews for Chemical Risk

Award identifier 06084cf39cee9a76d4a91bece818633e7accbcbcd09cb4e3fe59b263f33a0b1fAwarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2022

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INFERLINK CORP
Proposal award date
2021-12-01
Contract end date
2022-05-31
UEI
M8KCZYW54M17
Solicitation number
68HERC21R0144
Topic code
6A

Research abstract

We propose to develop a software system to generate systematic reviews of the scientific literature on chemical risks. The technology improves on what is currently available because it automates the full process of literature review. Unlike existing technologies that simply help humans find and filter relevant articles, our system uses state-of-the-art neural networks to find, filter, extract, summarize, and aggregate research. Risk assessments, and in particular systematic literature reviews, are an important tool to inform decision making and policy. Our technology will allow the EPA, and other organizations, to make health and environmentally sound decisions based on accurate and up-to-date chemical risk assessments. This in turn leads to saved time and money, and the ability to do much more with the same resources. In addition, because we will carefully validate the technology, we can assure that any assessments developed with it will be high quality, transparent, consistent, and scientifically defensible. Our plan relies on our extensive experience with natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) systems. In previous work, we developed and commercialized software to automate systematic reviews of clinical studies. In this phase I project our primary objective is to show that this technology can be repurposed and modified to accurately extract chemical risks data from research literature, and to design an end-to-end system that can be implemented in phase II. The technology we develop will be valuable to both government as well as businesses that rely on accurate science-based chemical risk reviews to make decisions. The approach we have planned out will allow us to provide a Software as a Service offering to inform decision making based on the collection and analysis of chemical risk scientific data. Markets that would have a need for our technology include the casualty insurance risk analytics market (which inform underwriting of environmental insurance andrelated lines) and the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) data market (which informs investors and Boards about evaluations of the environmental impact of companies). Both of these fast-growing markets are estimated to have an as-yet-unrealized potential market size over $1B.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

48 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2026). Reported award amounts total $24,575,096. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.