SBIR/STTR Research Award

Catheter for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Award identifier 403d8bf36e94c8412a45d3d92ed7e26a665f54653a707a320296707e40cc3f85Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,828,457

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Vantis Vascular Inc
Proposal award date
2021-08-15
Contract end date
2023-08-14
UEI
MNJTNGXVYS31
Solicitation number
PA20-260
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

ABSTRACT Nearly 1 million percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are performed each year in the US. Approximately 70% of these cases are considered complex and require the treatment of calcified lesions, tortuous vessels, and multi-vessel disease, often with total or sub-totally occluded lesions. Many operators avoid these more complex cases, which are often not suitable for radial access approaches due to the limitations of smaller size guide catheters and lack of support required to effectively deliver coronary stents and other interventional devices. To overcome this limitation, guide extension catheters (GEC) have been developed to help deliver stents in these challenging anatomies. GECs are currently utilized in approximately 18% of all coronary interventions. However, GECs have several key shortcomings that have prevented their usage other than as a bailout option. Specifically, current GECs are unable to access more distal tortuous lesions in 28% of cases, resulting in the inability to deliver a stent in many cases. Blunt ended tubular GECs also have serious safety issues with coronary artery dissection and/or plaque or thrombus embolization. Given that GECs are used in ~18% of all PCI cases, these data represent a significant volume of patients that are not treated effectively. Hence, CrossLiner Inc. has developed a novel multi-functional GEC that combines the requirement for deeper catheter intubation with a microcatheter leading tip, and pre-dilatation balloon on the leading element, to allow safe crossing of severe lesions in tortuous coronary vessels, with balloon pre-dilatation, followed by crossing the lesion with the guide extension and then seamless stent delivery. The combination of a GEC with a seamless transition from the outer to the inner microcatheter-balloon provides the capability for easier stent delivery, which can be unsheathed at the lesion as opposed to being delivered from a poorly supported proximal location. This approach enabled by the CrossLiner GEC will substantially improve PCI in patients with complex lesions while reducing risks, procedural duration, radiation/contrast exposure, stent dislodgement, coronary dissection and perforation that exist with current GECs. Data from bench and in vivo Phase I studies support the utility of CrossLiner’s multi-functional GEC by demonstrating a significant reduction in the force required to pass a highly angulated segment while increasing the intubation depth compared to first-generation devices. Results in vivo showed an increase in intubation depth from 5.6 cm to 12.9 cm and a 41% reduction in the time to deliver a stent. Importantly, the CrossLiner GEC was able to successfully cross stented segments in all vessels in a swine model of complex lesions, while first-generation devices were stuck proximal to the stent or at the stent edge in ~75% of the coronary vessels tested. The CrossLiner system is now ready for final process refinement and design control development (Aim 1) followed by usability evaluation, and regulatory clearance (Aim 2). Successful execution of these Phase II studies will position the CrossLiner GEC system for full commercialization of this highly innovative approach to improve the treatment for complex PCI patients.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2024). Reported award amounts total $4,112,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.