SBIR/STTR Research Award

Electro-Magnetic Harvester of Energy

Award identifier 4216cfafe2a0879b99bfe5d8c4a8c04de985afd9fa3a1994d334beb1f4c18e08Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$549,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
INTELLISENSE SYSTEMS INC
Proposal award date
2021-08-11
Contract end date
2023-01-11
UEI
C4Y5CNN55L37
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
A20-018

Research abstract

To address the Army’s need for a compact, efficient, field-harvesting power source, Intellisense Systems, Inc. (Intellisense) proposes, in Phase II, to advance development of the Electro-Magnetic Harvester of Energy (ETHER) system that has been proven feasible in Phase I. ETHER is based on a new design that adapts previously developed mature components into a new arrangement to achieve more than 50 mW average power delivery and 2 W peak power under all environmental conditions in a size less than 100 cm3 and with no dimension larger than 15 cm. Specifically, innovations in electric-field and magnetic-field harvesting combined with low-loss rectification and optimal power transfer have resulted in a system that meets all stated Army requirements without requiring connection to line power, large storage batteries, or exposure to solar energy. In Phase I, Intellisense performed theoretical analysis and demonstrated the feasibility of the ETHER technology by producing prototypes that harvested both electric and magnetic fields and by comparing performance of those prototypes with theoretical calculations. The prototypes not only harvested ambient fields for comparison of harvested power to theoretical models, but also included circuitry to efficiently rectify the AC voltages to regulated DC voltages, provided high-efficiency energy storage using ceramic capacitors, and efficiently converted the rectified and stored energy down to a regulated output. In Phase II, Intellisense plans to finalize the prototype into a fieldable, manufacturable system that will serve as a platform for self-powered sensors. Specifically, Intellisense will design features to aid installation and operation, demonstrate and test fully functional ETHER prototypes at Intellisense facilities, provide them for testing at Army-designated facilities, perform qualification testing, and establish production tooling and documentation for volume manufacturing. Because of the maturity of the Phase I design and the proven Phase I results, we envision transitioning the ETHER device to production by the end of the Phase II effort.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

337 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2026). Reported award amounts total $162,560,474. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.