SBIR/STTR Research Award

Advanced Shale Gas Recovery Technologies for Horizontal Well Completion Optimization

Award identifier 3a79f5c3f45724b639df36bb24558e6ccaac9281f7379eabd5fe37292ad3acf4Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
OCEANIT LABORATORIES INC
Proposal award date
2021-06-28
Contract end date
2022-03-27
UEI
S6X8FST9JAM7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
26a

Research abstract

Hydraulic fracturing can significantly increase well production, but it can be cost prohibitive and environmentally unsound due to the large volumes of water and proppant needed to perform the procedure. Typical slickwater (water + surfactant) systems are inefficient at distributing the proppant far into the fractures, underperforming compared to the potential output of the well. To reduce the water needed for each well, in addition to improving the potential outcome from the fracking procedure, new fluids which improve proppant transport while lowing the water content are needed. Foams which incorporate significant amounts of gas into a liquid phase can reduce the water content by up to 90% for the same volume of fluid. Stabilized by surfactants, the properties of foams can be tailored to have ideal properties for fracture permeation and proppant dispersion. Using natural gas from on-site or nearby wells can reduce the transportation costs, and by designing the foam to break down over time, as used in the fracturing procedure can be reclaimed. This study will focus on creating a metastable foam which displays robust stability during the fracturing period before decaying back into its constituent parts. It will be paired with a neutrally buoyant proppant material designed to be easily carried deep within fractures. Research will focus on surfactant selection, proppant integration, and permeability comparisons between traditional slickwater and the new foam fluid. If successful in the laboratory proof of concept is successful in Phase I, Phase II efforts will focus on high pressure validation, scale-up production, and eventual pilot deployments for this fluid. Wells which were previously too expensive to perform fracturing on, or were unsuitable for fracturing with high water content fluids, would be ideal candidates to use this solution. This is a step forward for environmental stewardship for wells while still allowing for the utilization of existing infrastructure, helping to promote energy independence in the US, where many shale gas plays are in need of stimulation.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

278 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2026). Reported award amounts total $141,296,922. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Commerce, National Science Foundation, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.