SBIR/STTR Research Award

Topological Data Analysis for Automated Annotation of EO/SAR Datasets

Award identifier d05d550c87bd22cea0bf766918bc2e79643b56b5747605321073e50ddca4eb85Awarding agency Department of Defense · National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2021

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
Recipient company
ARETE ASSOCIATES
Proposal award date
2021-06-14
Contract end date
2022-03-27
UEI
DMKEXJ8NQ4C5
Solicitation number
20.3
Topic code
NGA203-005

Research abstract

In recent years, it has become increasingly important to conduct Geospatial Intelligence (GEOINT) operation via commercial and government persistent sensor systems, which have produced a copious amount of data relevant to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). As the supply of data expands, it is necessary to employ automated analytics to exploit the data efficiently. We cannot rely on sheer human power to analyze data; instead, results must be automated and human analysts cued for final judgment. While there has been successful empirical application of AI algorithms on complex image domain problems (e.g., target/facial recognition), the mathematical basis has not kept pace, nor has there been a similar success in more difficult sensor modalities such as Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). Once trained, the current state of the art in AI is fragile on new data and methods are often ad hoc, not relying on technical/empirical rigor. For NGA, these issues are a significant impediment to ensuring reliability, explainability, and trustworthiness of neural networks, thus failing to achieve the trusted autonomy required to deliver on NGA's AAA Strategy. In high stakes environments of DoD applications, this situation is intolerable as the United States races for AI dominance. In response to this solicitation, Arete has developed a unique mathematical approach to dramatically reduce the human time required in AI systems based on recent advances in topological data analysis. Our method is also robust to noisy data with widely different views. During Phase I, we will perform a feasibility study, which will lead to the Homological Object Recognizer and Nomenclature Extraction Toolkit (HORNET) operating on SAR in Phase II.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

417 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2025). Reported award amounts total $220,044,517. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

ARETE ASSOCIATES

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.