SBIR/STTR Research Award

Dynamic, Distributed Open Common Operational Picture (D2O COP)

Award identifier 4f216a6031808c6b0ea88ba35126d7975af9c614c0cb796d414e15b4e730efbfAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$140,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Chesapeake Technology International, Corp.
Proposal award date
2020-08-28
Contract end date
2021-02-24
UEI
LAVARTMKKHT5
Solicitation number
20.1
Topic code
N201-036

Research abstract

CTI proposes leveraging and enhancing an existing government off the shelf (GOTS) tool for mapping and situational awareness tools called Raptor in order to meet the US Navy’s need for a common operational picture (COP) with an application programming interface (API) that is distributed, dynamic, and open. Raptor is an open, government-owned geospatial intelligence system (GIS) that is well-positioned to satisfy this need. It features a robust API and a mature suite of applications capable of running on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and server environments while maintaining a common set of data for visualization and analysis across these different deployments. Raptor can interface directly with physical devices and sensors to ingest data or perform command and control (C2). It can also connect directly to live data streams, such as video feeds, automatic identification system (AIS), Link 16, Integrated Broadcast Service (IBS), and more.While Raptor is already a mature platform that meets many of the requirements laid out in the request for proposal (RFP), there are still several questions to address to ensure it will be a feasible solution for an Aegis-based COP. First, CTI needs to research and understand any complexities associated with running Raptor on the Aegis computing environment and interfacing with existing Aegis software. CTI will also seek to characterize the requirement for compatibility with the C++ programming language and identify a feasible approach, as Raptor is currently developed entirely in Java, including the plugin API. Finally, while Raptor does provide a modular architecture that allows plugins to be installed and removed, this currently requires restarting the application. Initial analysis has already been performed to identify areas of the architecture that need to be modified to support on-the-fly plugin installation/removal. As part of this Phase 1 SBIR program, CTI will refine this analysis into an actionable architectural design.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2021). Reported award amounts total $6,217,843. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

CHESAPEAKE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, CORP.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.