SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase II: Safer Batteries to Mitigate Injuries from Accidental Ingestion in Children

Award identifier 5ed6b7fc181d5f9b4b8c88147f200298543317cfc0f476f908ccfff5df9d1e35Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
LANDSDOWNE LABS LLC
Proposal award date
2025-10-01
Contract end date
2027-09-30
UEI
MYLNW8MWFKJ5
Solicitation number
NSF 23-516
Topic code
EN

Research abstract

The broader/commercial impact of this Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project is to reduce the serious and sometimes fatal injuries caused by accidental ingestion of coin cell batteries, particularly in children. From 2010 to 2019, over 70,000 battery-related emergency room visits were recorded in the United States, with some resulting in internal burns, surgeries, or death. This project aims to develop safer battery casings that passively deactivate upon exposure to bodily fluids, reducing the risk of electrochemical injury. By providing a built-in safety mechanism that requires no external electronics or internal design changes, this innovation enables battery manufacturers to adopt enhanced safety standards with minimal production disruption. In addition to protecting children, the same technology could be extended to battery-powered ingestible and implantable medical devices, offering a broader benefit to public health. The work also advances scientific understanding of environmentally responsive materials and their integration into real-world consumer products. This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II project focuses on addressing the technical challenge of preventing current-induced tissue damage when coin cell batteries contact wet environments. The innovation lies in the use of metals that exhibit distinct electrochemical properties depending on environmental conductive fluids. The research will optimize the composition, thickness, and surface treatment of battery casings made from these materials to ensure that they suppress current when wet while maintaining dry- and humid-state performance and durability. The project includes development of scalable fabrication techniques, evaluation of mechanical integrity, and rigorous electrochemical testing under simulated ingestion conditions. A critical component of the research is maintaining the battery's internal seal to prevent moisture ingress while enabling the passive safety mechanism. Successful outcomes will lead to a manufacturable, safety-enhanced coin cell battery design with applications in consumer electronics and medical technologies. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,256,000. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.