SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of SiC-SiC Heat Exchangers for High Temperature Heat Transfer

Award identifier 9b1607f1d2b2cb24e77fa8a026c2e36f6c73c53df95bab0055edc5fb1d5563c3Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$198,769

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-06-29
Contract end date
2021-03-28
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DEFOA0002146
Topic code
37n

Research abstract

Industrial process heat is used for a large variety of applications with different heat requirements and with temperature ranges covering a wide spectrum. Process temperatures range from 100 to 180°C for district heating and desalination to over 800°C for coal gasification and hydrogen production. Although Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) systems can potentially provide much of the process heat needs, nuclear power systems are the best choice to minimize carbon release. Gen IV nuclear reactor technologies have advanced safety features could limit the size of low-population zones to the actual plant site boundary minimizing monitoring and evacuation planning that may discourage industrial users to locate adjacent to the power plants. The high operating temperatures of the Gen IV designs also make them able to support most industrial thermal processes.Yet, even when the industrial facilities are closer to the power plants, heat transfer can be difficult for high temperature processes. Reliable, high-temperature, SiC composite heat exchangers are important contributors to IES feasibility. High-temperature heat transfer between power plants and co-located industrial facilities requires coolants like molten salts with high boiling temperatures and very low vapor pressures. While less reactive than most liquid metals, molten salts are very corrosive and are not compatible with many traditional metals, especially at very high temperatures. High nickel alloy such as Haynes 230, offer short-term corrosion resistance, but these materials are very expensive and creep strength drops rapidly at the desired temperatures.Alternative materials and associated fabrication techniques are needed. Novatech will develop and demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing silicon carbide composites to fabricate robust, resilient heat exchangers that will effectively and efficiently integrate industrial energy users with high-temperature nuclear power plants.The technology already demonstrated by NovaTech has shown that SiC fiber wound SiC tubes are significantly more robust than simple SiC tubes and will retain their strength at high temperature. SiC is also compatible with high temperature liquid metals and molten salts. For this project, we will build on our experience in the design of SiC composite components for nuclear reactors and solar thermal power plants.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.