SBIR/STTR Research Award

Environmental Vibration Mitigation for Additive Manufacturing Equipment

Award identifier 92c5b63a71ceea8d25bfe87fdbe28e6ae0541ebd18ff579aa91a37db29d8e36cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$140,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
ETEGENT TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
Proposal award date
2020-06-16
Contract end date
2020-12-13
UEI
FLKAMJTNTDY1
Solicitation number
20.A
Topic code
N20A-T010

Research abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a rapidly evolving technology that is being used in a growing number of new and different applications. As applications become more diverse, so will the environments within which AM equipment is relied upon to operate effectively and produce high quality parts. One specific challenge is maintaining part quality when AM equipment is required to operate in environments with significant vibration sources. Such external vibration sources can cause undesirable print defects that render the finished part unfit for use.  Etegent Technologies, Ltd., The Ohio State University Center for Design and Manufacturing Excellence (CDME), and Stratasys, are partnering to develop an approach to mitigate the impact of environmental vibration on AM print quality. Some potential solutions are printer control compensation, active vibration mitigation, passive vibration mitigation, modification of printer structural components, or a combination thereof. In a preliminary experiment presented in this proposal, the team created visible print defects by exposing a consumer grade AM printer to vibration that is potentially encountered on Navy ships, as indicated by MIL-STD-167A. A simplified model was constructed to estimate the vibration attenuation that can be achieved by one possible mitigation approach - a passive vibration isolation system. While this is just one of many potential solutions, it was chosen as a straw-man design for this proposal as it would be low cost, rugged, and applicable to a wide range of printer and environmental vibration characteristics. In the Phase I effort the team will conduct a comprehensive study to understand the fundamental physical phenomenology behind different vibration-induced part defects and part quality degradation, and determine the most pragmatic mitigation approaches for the Navy’s needs. Modeling, analysis, and lab testing will be conducted to estimate the effectiveness of different mitigation approaches. In Phase II and Phase III, the team will implement the optimal mitigation approach on representative AM equipment, demonstrate capabilities in a lab, install technology on a ship, and collect data required to quantify its effectiveness in practice.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

94 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2025). Reported award amounts total $50,147,198. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.